You don't think there would be an issue with a guy only playing hard when he has the ball or when a play is called for him?
Not playing any D, standing around when the ball isn't in your hands, as long as you're efficient when you do shoot the ball, that's cool?
Now granted, if we're talking about shooting 24 of 28, I do agree that the dude can do whatever he wants basically, and it's cool, but I know that's not exactly what we're talking about here lol.
Wade only plays hard, these days, when he has the ball. besides that he basically sleeps on the court. i'd take him 100 times out of 100 over a hard worker who tried harder than him but was less productive.
there are defensive metrics that analyze how your opponent does against you. i consider that part of being a great/efficient player.
wiggins gets called the canadian jordan and canadian hoops is disrespected.he goes out, kills it, and speaks his mind in the most positive way he could via twitter, and then the guy from SI comes out today and says his shit was taken outta context. So predictable. Pathetic too
shel311 wrote:
And I think DWade's halfcourt D is just fine. His transition D is pathetic, he is absolutely loafing in that department.
fair enough.
i'll take 5 D Wades and you can take 5 Kenneth Farieds and i'll win 100/100 times.
i don't care about a player 'loafing', a player being a 'locker room cancer', etc etc that stuff is opinionated, its biased and its blown out of proportion by media.
Russell Westbrook, by almost all accounts, is a horrible teammate. i'll take him over just about any PG in the league not named Paul/Kyrie.
Wiggins is touted as a generational talent. I've never personally been considered the best in the world in something so I wouldnt know how I'd react, but in a sport that is pretty 1 on 1 for the most part, and I'm the best in the world in my age bracket, id be bored too if I didnt have the ball. In fact, why wouldnt I have the ball? Arent we trying to win? lol
shel311 wrote:
And I think DWade's halfcourt D is just fine. His transition D is pathetic, he is absolutely loafing in that department.
fair enough.
i'll take 5 D Wades and you can take 5 Kenneth Farieds and i'll win 100/100 times.
i don't care about a player 'loafing', a player being a 'locker room cancer', etc etc that stuff is opinionated, its biased and its blown out of proportion by media.
Russell Westbrook, by almost all accounts, is a horrible teammate. i'll take him over just about any PG in the league not named Paul/Kyrie.
I'm calling it a day, we're arguing 2 entirely different things lol.
im hearing a lot of arguments about Drummond having a better pro career than Davis. I dont watch NBA much so dunno if thats just ridiculous thinking or what.
nick wrote:im hearing a lot of arguments about Drummond having a better pro career than Davis. I dont watch NBA much so dunno if thats just ridiculous thinking or what.
I haven't really watched much, if any, but man, he sure seems like a beast lol. Id still be happy with the Davis pick just based on the risk.
Drummond seems to be bucking that trend with those project type picks, seems like those guys rarely really pan out in the NBA.
Drummond's athleticism/size combo is far superior to any other project I can ever remember. The comparisons, to Dwight, physically, a definitely valid. I know a lot of people got on the Derrick Favors band wagon with a similar comparison, but it's really not even close there.