NDL Forum

shel311 wrote:

trendon wrote:[308] HOU TEXANS -4½-110
[331] SD CHARGERS o47½-110
2 TEAM TEASERS
[317] CHI BEARS +17½-110 (B+6)
[317] CHI BEARS o37½-110 (B+6)
[308] HOU TEXANS -4½-110
[329] ARI CARDINALS o39½-110

viewtopic.php?f=109&t=18143&p=246519#p246519

Settle down, I am working on it. I haven't had time for anything, let alone OOTP.

Rams -3 2H

VeniVediV1ci wrote:Rams -3 2H

Have you won a second half bet this eternity? I swear you do fine in anything not labeled SECOND HALF. I hope you say, "Yes, Trendon, I do very well" because I have the Rams for the fucking game.

my only two bowl wins this season were 2Hs

and i won TB 2H today, too.

Considering i can't win anything else in football anymore, 3 wins in the 2H this season are enough for me

Ravens opened up at -2.5 @ KC

i'm literally scared about how much i like them in that game. under a fg, are you kidding me?

this is one of those, it seems too good to be true so i should stay far away games.

DRiccio21 wrote:Ravens opened up at -2.5 @ KC

i'm literally scared about how much i like them in that game. under a fg, are you kidding me?

this is one of those, it seems too good to be true so i should stay far away games.

before i looked at the lines yesterday,i do my own line and see what the difference is. i had balt -5 ,and when i saw -2.5 i thought the same thing as you dave.might just stay away

if you stay away from that line, you'll regret it

ajalves wrote:if you stay away from that line, you'll regret it

Agreed.

Ed Reed will have 3 pick 6s because Cassell will continue to test him being out of position relentlessly and Reed will get lucky and house em all.

DRiccio21 wrote:Ravens opened up at -2.5 @ KC

i'm literally scared about how much i like them in that game. under a fg, are you kidding me?

this is one of those, it seems too good to be true so i should stay far away games.

i played it.

I have Baltimore 20-1 and i've been riding them since week 13 when they've had reasonable (basically pick 'em) lines

Arrowhead is no joke, though

plasma1896 wrote:before i looked at the lines yesterday,i do my own line and see what the difference is. i had balt -5 ,and when i saw -2.5 i thought the same thing as you dave.might just stay away

i guessed kc -1, but they couldn't give BAL +money on the ML

KC wins this season

vs San Diego -- looked like a huge win, SD had issues this season, still a nice win tho
@ Cleveland -- they stink
vs San Fran -- they stink
vs Jacksonville -- nice win
vs Buffalo -- ot win, they stink
vs Arizona -- they stink
@ Seattle -- they don't stink but aren't good but on the road its respectable
vs Denver -- they stink
@ St Louis -- they don't stink but aren't good on the road its respectable
vs Tennessee -- they stunk at that point

they played a last place schedule. they killed teams with their run but Baltimore has the 5th best rush defense in the league.

Baltimore has wins over the Jets, Steelers, Bucs, and Saints this year.

i am just shocked they didn't make it 3.5... just to have it over 3.

i'm locked in on Balt -2.5

Ravens also should have beaten NE (up 10 in the 4th), Atlanta (lead under the 2:00 warning) and Pittsburgh (again)

Va tech +3.5

I know its late but Tren can confirm plus you guys know I have a hard on for Harbaugh and Luck. Stanford -3.5 (-115)

packsyD22 wrote:I know its late but Tren can confirm plus you guys know I have a hard on for Harbaugh and Luck. Stanford -3.5 (-115)

And I have the opposite bet. Fuck you Pat!

Kid I coached just helped me out with that pick. Its people helpin people, real powerful stuff.

packsyD22 wrote:Kid I coached just helped me out with that pick. Its people helpin people, real powerful stuff.

I also have Under 59 (was 59.5 until I hit submit) and this douche Luck doesn't seem to care.

trendon wrote:

packsyD22 wrote:Kid I coached just helped me out with that pick. Its people helpin people, real powerful stuff.

I also have Under 59 (was 59.5 until I hit submit) and this douche Luck doesn't seem to care.

Your under will be fine Sally. Shoulda listened to me earlier when I texted you about Stanford, I watched every game of theirs this year, they real fuggin good.

packsyD22 wrote:

trendon wrote:

packsyD22 wrote:Kid I coached just helped me out with that pick. Its people helpin people, real powerful stuff.

I also have Under 59 (was 59.5 until I hit submit) and this douche Luck doesn't seem to care.

Your under will be fine Sally. Shoulda listened to me earlier when I texted you about Stanford, I watched every game of theirs this year, they real fuggin good.

They are from the Pacific Ten. Today was a fluke.