Page 55 of 131
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 6:27 pm
by shel311
DRiccio21 wrote:shel311 wrote:Sooooo Washington just gave 35 year old McNabb a 5 year extension with $40 mil guaranteed.
LOL
wait, what?
That was not a typo.

Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 7:07 pm
by Seeitsaveit13
shel311 wrote:DRiccio21 wrote:shel311 wrote:Sooooo Washington just gave 35 year old McNabb a 5 year extension with $40 mil guaranteed.
LOL
wait, what?
That was not a typo.

Actually it was... He's 33 and won't be 34 til the end of the month. Bazinga

Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 7:09 pm
by NCSUholmey
ESPN was saying that Washington will probably have a walk away clause in the contract to allow them to drop Donovan before the majority of the guaranteed money part hits. Did not make sense to me, but they said it will likely be guaranteed if the team picks up the option
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 7:41 pm
by Seeitsaveit13
I'd also wager a large sum of money that he doesn't play for 5 years. This just appears to be a way to show that they're confident in him as their QB. Like it or not, there aren't any other options right now, nor is there a young guy backing him up. If they want to make the playoffs this year, its going to take a fully-confident, organization-backed, McNabb (and a miracle lol) so this was a good time to re-illustrate that confidence. He'll probably shift towards more of a mentorship role if we ever draft a young QB in the next few years (albeit a very expensive mentor).
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:03 pm
by DRiccio21
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:I'd also wager a large sum of money that he doesn't play for 5 years.
obviously, years mean next to nothing in an nfl contract
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:32 pm
by Seeitsaveit13
DRiccio21 wrote:Seeitsaveit13 wrote:I'd also wager a large sum of money that he doesn't play for 5 years.
obviously, years mean next to nothing in an nfl contract
Right, but a lot of people are freaking out saying that they shouldn't have signed him for that long, I was just agreeing with you
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:33 pm
by DRWebs
How bout that for a first quarter

Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:36 pm
by jsence2
I have Vick, Maclin, and Philly's defense on my fantasy team. I needed 120 points to come back and win. He has Santana Moss.
Vick already has me 69 points

Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:38 pm
by Seeitsaveit13
jsence2 wrote:I have Vick, Maclin, and Philly's defense on my fantasy team. I needed 120 points to come back and win. He has Santana Moss.
Vick already has me 69 points

The fuck kind of league are you in that you can get 69 points already?
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:45 pm
by jsence2
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:jsence2 wrote:I have Vick, Maclin, and Philly's defense on my fantasy team. I needed 120 points to come back and win. He has Santana Moss.
Vick already has me 69 points

The fuck kind of league are you in that you can get 69 points already?
Custom league my old HS teacher runs. QBs get PPC and get bonus points when they reach 350 and 400 yds passing.
TD's are also worth 10 points, INTs are -5
It's a QB-dominated league. Scores are usually between 250-350 points.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:39 pm
by DRiccio21
aparently the McNabb deal is not that impactful at all. if they cut him after this season they only owe him like 4 mil from the signing bonus and an incentive for finishing this year.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:05 pm
by packsyD22
The Eagles look like the best team in the NFL. Defense is shaky at times.......but Asante will show up in the playoffs.
Vick looks like he has only gotten better since he was in Atlanta. Its like a track meet out there with him Jackson, and McCoy.
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:32 pm
by walker213
packsyD22 wrote:The Eagles look like the best team in the NFL. Defense is shaky at times.......but Asante will show up in the playoffs.
Vick looks like he has only gotten better since he was in Atlanta. Its like a track meet out there with him Jackson, and McCoy.
Don't forget Maclin either!
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:36 pm
by walker213
trendon wrote:Wow ... you tell 'em Mora!!
"To me, this is high treason. An NFL football player does not turn down a play like that. And if I'm Jason Garrett, the first thing that I'm doing when I take over as the head coach of this team, is I'm getting guys like that -- number 21, who absolutely committed treason, let his team down by passing up a tackle and let the ball get in the end zone -- I'm taking him and I'm getting him out of my locker room."
--Former Falcons and Seahawks coach Jim Mora, on NFL Network, after watching Dallas cornerback Mike Jenkins back off a tackle against Green Bay's James Jones eight days ago.
Read more:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/w ... z15ODA1WTG
I remember the one vs. the Giants. Where's the one vs. Green Bay?
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:35 pm
by trendon
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:41 am
by shel311
LOL

Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:18 am
by Seeitsaveit13
shel311 wrote:LOL

Haynesworthless at it again, now we know why Vick had 8.5 seconds to throw on that play...
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:05 pm
by trendon
Random stat I found; LOL at the stupid Jets
NFL Teams Regular Season Wins Since AFL-NFL Merger Through Last Sunday:
1. Steelers - 378
2. Dolphins - 377
3. Cowboys - 369
4. Broncos - 358
4. Vikings - 358
6. 49ers - 348
7. Redskins - 341
8. Raiders - 338
9. Patriots - 331
10. Eagles - 321
11. Rams - 317
12. Packers - 316
13. Colts - 315
14. Giants - 313
15. Bears - 312
16. Oilers/Titans - 306
17. Chiefs - 303
18. Chargers - 293
19. Bills - 290
20. Jets - 278
21. Bengals - 277
22. Falcons - 271
23. Saints - 269
24. Seahawks - 260
25. Browns - 256
26. Cardinals - 254
27. Lions - 250
28. Buccaneers - 214
29. Jaguars - 130
30. Ravens - 122
31. Panthers - 118
32. Texans - 53
Average Per Year:
1. Steelers - 9.22 (41)
2. Dolphins - 9.20 (41)
3. Cowboys - 9.00 (41)
4. Broncos - 8.73 (41)
4. Vikings - 8.73 (41)
6. 49ers - 8.49 (41)
7. Redskins - 8.32 (41)
8. Raiders - 8.24 (41)
9. Ravens - 8.13 (15)
10. Jaguars - 8.13 (16)
11. Patriots - 8.07 (41)
12. Eagles - 7.83 (41)
13. Rams - 7.73 (41)
14. Packers - 7.70 (41)
15. Colts - 7.68 (41)
16. Giants - 7.63 (41)
17. Bears - 7.61 (41)
18. Oilers/Titans - 7.46 (41)
19. Seahawks - 7.43 (35)
20. Chiefs - 7.39 (41)
21. Panthers - 7.38 (16)
22. Chargers - 7.15 (41)
23. Bills - 7.07 (41)
24. Jets - 6.78 (41)
25. Bengals - 6.76 (41)
26. Browns - 6.74 (38)
27. Falcons - 6.61 (41)
28. Saints - 6.56 (41)
29. Cardinals - 6.20 (41)
30. Buccaneers - 6.11 (35)
31. Lions - 6.10 (41)
32. Texans - 5.89 (9)
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:33 pm
by NCSUholmey
weird that they put the Browns part 1 with the Browns part 2 and not Browns 1 with the Ravens. Yet once Tennessee moved, they still get the oilers stats and not given to the team from Houston now
Re: NFL Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:03 pm
by trendon
NCSUholmey wrote:weird that they put the Browns part 1 with the Browns part 2 and not Browns 1 with the Ravens. Yet once Tennessee moved, they still get the oilers stats and not given to the team from Houston now
Presumably because they became a second franchise unlike the Rams, Oilers, and Cardinals.