Re: Evolution of the NDL
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:10 pm

This actually doesn't make sense to me. It, in essence, creates the situation where you have people that want to remain part of the community (and the community would be happy to have them remain as a member), but that don't want to actually play in the seasons, but they're forced to, so you get more "deadbeat" owners.Nole4real wrote:dakshdar wrote: It's caused me to give consideration to just retiring from being an owner.
which is why even though guys like you in 101% excellent standing in the league will still have boards access removed if you dont have a team
sucks but im sure most of you can understand the reason behind it
agreed. Probably would get a few "required" articles at leasttrendon wrote:There should be an uptick in the responsibilities of a coach if that will be the case.
People in this thread alone have made it clear they are only in the league for the boards and the fringe stuff. if we let people drop without playing, 25-30 people would leave within 24 hours of abolishing the rule. another 25-30 before the 1st season was overdakshdar wrote:This actually doesn't make sense to me. It, in essence, creates the situation where you have people that want to remain part of the community (and the community would be happy to have them remain as a member), but that don't want to actually play in the seasons, but they're forced to, so you get more "deadbeat" owners.Nole4real wrote:dakshdar wrote: It's caused me to give consideration to just retiring from being an owner.
which is why even though guys like you in 101% excellent standing in the league will still have boards access removed if you dont have a team
sucks but im sure most of you can understand the reason behind it
So we instead hold board access over people's heads as a reason to stay and play a game they don't necessarilly (*EDIT*: well, not that they don't want to play, but that they'd be open to giving up their spot to someone that really wants to play in the league because they love the game) want to play just so they can keep hanging out with their internet friends. That seems like a bad model to follow.
Since I'd imagine that most people that stop playing don't want to stay on the boards, I'm not sure why this is even an issue really.
See ya Dan.ajalves wrote:People in this thread alone have made it clear they are only in the league for the boards and the fringe stuff. if we let people drop without playing, 25-30 people would leave within 24 hours of abolishing the rule. another 25-30 before the 1st season was over
ajalves wrote:People in this thread alone have made it clear they are only in the league for the boards and the fringe stuff. if we let people drop without playing, 25-30 people would leave within 24 hours of abolishing the rule. another 25-30 before the 1st season was overdakshdar wrote:This actually doesn't make sense to me. It, in essence, creates the situation where you have people that want to remain part of the community (and the community would be happy to have them remain as a member), but that don't want to actually play in the seasons, but they're forced to, so you get more "deadbeat" owners.Nole4real wrote:dakshdar wrote: It's caused me to give consideration to just retiring from being an owner.
which is why even though guys like you in 101% excellent standing in the league will still have boards access removed if you dont have a team
sucks but im sure most of you can understand the reason behind it
So we instead hold board access over people's heads as a reason to stay and play a game they don't necessarilly (*EDIT*: well, not that they don't want to play, but that they'd be open to giving up their spot to someone that really wants to play in the league because they love the game) want to play just so they can keep hanging out with their internet friends. That seems like a bad model to follow.
Since I'd imagine that most people that stop playing don't want to stay on the boards, I'm not sure why this is even an issue really.
Cnasty wrote:See ya Dan.ajalves wrote:People in this thread alone have made it clear they are only in the league for the boards and the fringe stuff. if we let people drop without playing, 25-30 people would leave within 24 hours of abolishing the rule. another 25-30 before the 1st season was over
Nothing personal.
you never wanna shoot with meajalves wrote:While this is being discussed so nicely, I really encourage you guys who normally "just" play football to jump in the fringe league/groups.
makes things a lot more fun
if given the choice i dont play Deathmatchnick wrote:you never wanna shoot with meajalves wrote:While this is being discussed so nicely, I really encourage you guys who normally "just" play football to jump in the fringe league/groups.
makes things a lot more fun
nick wrote:you never wanna shoot with meajalves wrote:While this is being discussed so nicely, I really encourage you guys who normally "just" play football to jump in the fringe league/groups.
makes things a lot more fun
same. thats my friends who play. I prefer Headquarters. I dont care about K/D I care about winning.ajalves wrote:if given the choice i dont play Deathmatchnick wrote:you never wanna shoot with meajalves wrote:While this is being discussed so nicely, I really encourage you guys who normally "just" play football to jump in the fringe league/groups.
makes things a lot more fun
If guys read nothing else in here, I hope they see this. Doing Dynasties, NDL:L and 2k definitely helped me to branch out and find even more coaches in the league that I really enjoy playing against. Right off the top of my head I think of BiggSteve and bigred as 2 guys that I played a lot of 2k with, trying to learn the game together. I wish I had a clue how to play shooters, because that would be great too. Really looking forward to FIFA and the crew that is signed up for that.ajalves wrote:While this is being discussed so nicely, I really encourage you guys who normally "just" play football to jump in the fringe league/groups.
makes things a lot more fun