NDL Forum

sixpackdan101 wrote:

nick wrote:theyre taking men who are married though... unless people cant read

Great way to dodge the comment there, Nick! Nicely done!

I was waiting to see his response to the link, nothing said was spoken loudly by you there nick.

nick wrote:lol k

This actually got a giggle out of me.

Article - The federal government's much-anticipated Syrian refugee plan will limit those accepted into Canada to women, children and familiesonly,

why the fuck would they put families? to be redundant? Families potentially include Men, Women and Children, and we already know theyre taking women and children so familiies must include... drum roll.. men!

Nick - 25 000 people. good stuff

Sixpack - You're not going to criticize Canada for not taking Syrian men [see: families]? Shocker!

Nick - theyre taking men who are married though... unless people cant read

Sixpack - Herp Derp Great way to dodge the comment there, Nick! Nicely done!

Nick - K

Why are they not accepting single men?

ReignOnU wrote:Why are they not accepting single men?

They are obviously terrorists.

ReignOnU wrote:Why are they not accepting single men?

why dont you email my government and ask?

Obamas face when addressing "religious tests" for refugees to come to the US is arguably the best face ever.



its a look at "cannot believe i have to address this idiocy"

I bet Obama cant wait til his presidential term ends.

nick wrote:
I bet Obama cant wait til his presidential term ends.

That makes 63,319,135+ of us.

nick wrote:
I bet Obama cant wait til his presidential term ends.

A lot of Americans can't wait either

as an outsider, Obama might go down as one of the best presidents America has ever had.

Yeah, ok.

nick wrote:Article - The federal government's much-anticipated Syrian refugee plan will limit those accepted into Canada to women, children and familiesonly,

why the fuck would they put families? to be redundant? Families potentially include Men, Women and Children, and we already know theyre taking women and children so familiies must include... drum roll.. men!

Nick - 25 000 people. good stuff

Sixpack - You're not going to criticize Canada for not taking Syrian men [see: families]? Shocker!

Nick - theyre taking men who are married though... unless people cant read

Sixpack - Herp Derp Great way to dodge the comment there, Nick! Nicely done!

Nick - K

Nick, we know what 'families' means. If you can't derive from my post that I was talking about individual men then you are an idiot, plain and simple. I don't think you're an idiot, so you must be dodging the question at hand. Why aren't they accepting individual men? To your point, none of the terrorists were refugees, so why not accept them all?

It's obvious to everyone here that you disagree with pretty much everything America does. Canada on the other hand can do no wrong. Where do you think Canada ranks vs America on the list of targets terrorists/ISIS/extremists would like to hit? Pretty fucking far down the list. So if Canada won't accept individual men due to security concerns, why do you find it so appalling that a lot of Americans don't want to accept any refugees at all?

nick wrote:

Spoiler!

This is great btw as it is totally antithetical to your opinion.

none of the terrorists were refugees, so why not accept them all? - Did I say anything about not allowing them in??? Am I the Prime Minister of Canada?

It's obvious to everyone here that you disagree with pretty much everything America does. Canada on the other hand can do no wrong. - I'm as patriotic towards Canada as all your Americans are to America. Dont fool yourself.

Where do you think Canada ranks vs America on the list of targets terrorists/ISIS/extremists would like to hit? Pretty fucking far down the list - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Onta ... orism_plot

So if Canada won't accept individual men due to security concerns, why do you find it so appalling that a lot of Americans don't want to accept any refugees at all? - Americans should worry about the 23 000 murders a year and less about some immigrants fleeing a war torn country.

nick wrote:as an outsider, Obama might go down as one of the best presidents America has ever had.

Not even close!

Foreign policy has been garbage

Obama care was widely disliked by the masses yet he still went along with it

No domestic policy change except for Obama care.

Extremely divisive on race relations. Comes out publicly to support young black men who were killed by police that ended up being nothing but criminals or thugs, while not offering public condolences to slain officers.

GeorgesGoons wrote:

nick wrote:as an outsider, Obama might go down as one of the best presidents America has ever had.

Not even close!

Foreign policy has been garbage

Obama care was widely disliked by the masses yet he still went along with it

No domestic policy change except for Obama care.

Extremely divisive on race relations. Comes out publicly to support young black men who were killed by police that ended up being nothing but criminals or thugs, while not offering public condolences to slain officers.

nick wrote:Get educated you white trash piece of shit

That is a little uncalled for don't you think?

Good to see you edit your post. Don't think Dan deserved that.

GeorgesGoons wrote:

nick wrote:Get educated you white trash piece of shit

That is a little uncalled for don't you think?

loll youre a white trash piece of shit too.

That may be funny to you nick, but for many people in America, this is their opinion of him.

a lot of americans have racist opinions of the president? Why does the kids skin color matter in the situation. That bomb kid was brown.. I'm sure Obama has praised white people too..