Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:45 am
Western Michigan doesn't go undefeated very often.
Get while the getting is good.
Get while the getting is good.
Page 62 of 71
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:51 am
Jamal Adams is good at football
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:55 am
Running start and unblocked versus a QB...He should make that play 9/10 times regardless of Lamar Jackson or not
#hater
#hater
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:58 am
Minnesota does seem an underwhelming next stop for himSeeitsaveit13 wrote:Seems like a rush move for Fleck. If he's truly the golden boy that everyone things he is... why take the first job offer you get with Minny?
Wait one more year at WMU, and get a bigger, better job, where you have a chance to succeed.
Unless he had a bunch of seniors at WMU and he thinks they'll fall back? Or he's from Minnesota?
Just seems like he could have done better for himself
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 12:00 pm
Play recognition.DRWebs wrote:Running start
#homer
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 12:04 pm
shel311 wrote:Play recognition.DRWebs wrote:Running start
#homer
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 12:05 pm
Agreed.DRWebs wrote:Running start and unblocked versus a QB...He should make that play 9/10 times regardless of Lamar Jackson or not
#hater
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 12:49 pm
Adams is a BAMF.
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 1:01 pm
Can't imagine what it's like to watch a Saints or Tigers game with himCnasty wrote:Agreed.DRWebs wrote:Running start and unblocked versus a QB...He should make that play 9/10 times regardless of Lamar Jackson or not
#hater
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 1:02 pm
This guy
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 1:03 pm
Not necessarily bad, more along the lines of the extreme highs and extreme lows is what I'm thinkingshel311 wrote:This guy
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 1:03 pm
Me? Extreme highs and lows?DRWebs wrote:Not necessarily bad, more along the lines of the extreme highs and extreme lows is what I'm thinkingshel311 wrote:This guy
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 1:09 pm
Fair assessment.DRWebs wrote:Not necessarily bad, more along the lines of the extreme highs and extreme lows is what I'm thinking
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 1:10 pm
Quit playingCnasty wrote:Fair assessment.DRWebs wrote:Not necessarily bad, more along the lines of the extreme highs and extreme lows is what I'm thinking
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 4:20 pm
Fiesty but LSU?Cnasty wrote:Fair assessment.DRWebs wrote:Not necessarily bad, more along the lines of the extreme highs and extreme lows is what I'm thinking
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 4:22 pm
Ok, now we crossed a line you just don't cross!!!!
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 4:35 pm
shel311 wrote:Ok, now we crossed a line you just don't cross!!!!
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:48 pm
Who ya got tonight?
I got the Fightin' Dabos shocking the world.
Clemson 31
Bama 28
I got the Fightin' Dabos shocking the world.
Clemson 31
Bama 28
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:50 pm
Bama 31
Clemson 23
Because...Bama
Clemson 23
Because...Bama
Re: College Football 2016 Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:51 pm
Jimmy Greenbeans ftw