Page 8 of 8
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:25 am
by Uuaww
ChampDizzle wrote:1. VT has to win ACC Title game
2. Stanford has to win out
3. Michigan St has to win BIG10 Title game although opponent likely not ranked
4. UConn if two stumble has good chance despite no conf title game.
5. Boise St win out and use ndl:f provision
VT wins the ACC Title and he's in. If Stanford wins out, he is probably the #2 team and the discussion likely ends there.
The big question will be if Stanford or V-Tech stumbles; then we are stuck with deciding between UConn, Michigan State and NDL:F.
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:31 am
by DRiccio21
it'll be interesting to see how Massey has it all figured out.
i wish the massey conferences were updated so i could get a better grasp of the true rankings of each conference.
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 5:34 pm
by Nole4real
i'll vote like i always do
i take all the 1 loss teams and rank them in order according to SOS from Massey
even if VT loses the conf champ game late in the season, he's still in it to me because im gonna take a step back and look at everyones whole season (via sos)
only fair imo to give the nod to whomever has the tougher schedule whether it be by scheduling or conf affiliation
but the fun is everyone votes how they want whether they have a "system" or not then everyone bashing the choices when the polls are public (though in all honesty, there usually isnt much bashing as most are usually in agreement)
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 5:43 pm
by Nole4real
lol, i saw that weezie
yes, i meant id still consider him as in not consider WHEN the loss occured
but you already figured that out
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 5:45 pm
by Weasel
Nole4real wrote:lol, i saw that weezie
yes, i meant id still consider him as in not consider WHEN the loss occured
but you already figured that out
Yeah, after typing it I realized I sounded like a complete dolt.
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:49 pm
by DRiccio21
Nole4real wrote:
i take all the 1 loss teams and rank them in order according to SOS from Massey
even if VT loses the conf champ game late in the season, he's still in it to me because im gonna take a step back and look at everyones whole season (via sos)
isn't this contradictory since VT has one of the lowest SOS of the potential 1 loss teams (assuming he lost in the conference title game)?
i might be missing something you were trying to say.
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:54 pm
by ReignOnU
I'm going to try to makes some sense of it myself when I scribble out all of the "quality wins" and all losses... if that fails, I'm going to Massey, lol.
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:59 pm
by Nole4real
DRiccio21 wrote:Nole4real wrote:
i take all the 1 loss teams and rank them in order according to SOS from Massey
even if VT loses the conf champ game late in the season, he's still in it to me because im gonna take a step back and look at everyones whole season (via sos)
isn't this contradictory since VT has one of the lowest SOS of the potential 1 loss teams (assuming he lost in the conference title game)?
i might be missing something you were trying to say.
was just pointing out that i wont consider WHEN anyone lost. i'll put them all together and make decisions based on their complete body of work
so even if vt (or any other team) loses a conf champ game, im saying i'll still consider them
VT in reality will probably be at the bottom of the 1 loss teams rankings i submit due to their SOS but just saying, they will still be considered with all other 1 loss teams
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:00 pm
by NCSUholmey
Nole4real wrote:i'll vote like i always do
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:01 pm
by Nole4real
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:01 pm
by DRiccio21
ahhhh, okay i understand now.
agreed.
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:03 pm
by DRiccio21
luckily i decided to schedule Trendon.
i played 11 BCS conference teams with my worst OOC being a mid 50's massey rated Illinois and then i kept my game with Trendon who has played all of 1 game, mine
leave it to Trendon to come back to fuck me over.
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:05 pm
by Uuaww
DRiccio21 wrote:luckily i decided to schedule Trendon.
i played 11 BCS conference teams with my worst OOC being a mid 50's massey rated Illinois and then i kept my game with Trendon who has played all of 1 game, mine
leave it to Trendon to come back to fuck me over.
btw, it wouldn't surprise me at all if he did this on purpose.
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:07 pm
by Nole4real
if you dont make champ game im gonna run the calculations based on you playing an "average" team
good lord that'd be hilarious fuel for the riccio/tren rivalry if he ended up keeping you out due to his suckiness
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:20 pm
by Weasel
DRiccio21 wrote:
isn't this contradictory since VT has one of the lowest SOS of the potential 1 loss teams (assuming he lost in the conference title game)?
i might be missing something you were trying to say.
This is damn near the exact thing I posted before deleting it (what Nole was referring to in his post right before mine).
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:36 pm
by shel311
Nole4real wrote:i'll vote like i always do
i take all the 1 loss teams and rank them in order according to SOS from Massey
For my final vote, I do the exact same thing, only I'll also look at the top 3 or 4 teams each team played and make changes if I think one guy played a more top heavy schedule.
Re: ...and then their were 8 (NSFW)
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:38 pm
by shel311
Nole4real wrote:
if you dont make champ game im gonna run the calculations based on you playing an "average" team
good lord that'd be hilarious fuel for the riccio/tren rivalry if he ended up keeping you out due to his suckiness
Would be a great comeback for the Senator bit.