NDL Forum

I shot Pengy a message, I just got home, I slipped on some ice leaving friend's house and banged up my knee pretty good.

We're gonna try to go Sunday night if he can; if not then I'll go on AP. Isn't anybody's fault but won't penalize him for my clumsiness.

Alright.

Jags win 17-14 in a game that both could teams could have broken open with the chances they had. Several dropped picks frustrated Penn State, while the Jags saw 2 deep early drive both only result in FGs, then with a 6-0 the pick off PSU only to punt it back 3 plays later. It all added up to a close game, and the 2nd 3 point win vs a top opponent in as many weeks. Now the Jags take a week off before heading on the road and their quest to send as many of the Red Raiders as they possibly can to the ICU.

Next advance is scheduled for February 27th

Welcome to Week 6! Remember to visit dynasty.easports.com to write your own stories.

UNLV (2-2) vs UMass (0-4)
Last week, the Rebels won 49-37 vs. Ball State (1-2)
In recruiting news, the following UNLV targets announced their decisions:
ATH Adrian Jolly USC

Western Michigan (2-1)has a bye week
Last week, the Broncos had a bye week
In recruiting news, there were no commitments by Western Michigan targets.

#24 Texas A&M (5-0) at #5 Auburn (4-0)
Last week, the Aggies won 65-63 at Arkansas (2-1)
In recruiting news, there were no commitments by Texas A&M targets.

Wyoming (4-0) vs Colorado State (5-0)
Last week, the Cowboys won 35-28 at Nevada (0-4)
In recruiting news, the following Wyoming targets announced their decisions:
SS Colt McBride Ariz
DT Geoff Adams UVA

#11 South Alabama (5-0)has a bye week
Last week, the Jaguars won 17-14 vs. Penn State (3-1)
In recruiting news, the following South Alabama targets announced their decisions:
OLB Rob Dawson USA

#6 Penn State (3-1) at #16 Purdue (3-1)
Last week, the Nittany Lions lost 17-14 at South Alabama (5-0)
In recruiting news, the following Penn State targets announced their decisions:
G James Carter Mich

#12 Texas Tech (4-0)has a bye week
Last week, the Red Raiders won 30-18 at USF (2-1)
In recruiting news, there were no commitments by Texas Tech targets.

#7 Tennessee (3-1) at Georgia (1-3)
Last week, the Volunteers had a bye week
In recruiting news, there were no commitments by Tennessee targets.

#20 California (4-1) at #19 UCLA (4-1)
Last week, the Golden Bears won 38-7 at USC (3-1)
In recruiting news, the following California targets announced their decisions:
WR Akeem Overstreet USC

#9 Oklahoma State (3-1)has a bye week
Last week, the Cowboys won 45-31 at West Virginia (2-2)
In recruiting news, the following Oklahoma State targets announced their decisions:
CB Steve Burns TCU
DT Freddie Gibbs Tulsa

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UNDEFEATED COUNTDOWN

California
Oklahoma State
Penn State
South Alabama
Tennessee
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
UNLV
Western Michigan
Wyoming

TOP 25

#6 Penn State
#7 Tennessee
#9 Oklahoma State
#11 South Alabama
#12 Texas Tech
#20 Cal
#24 Texas A&M



HEISMAN HOPEFULS

James White, HB Texas A&M
Tre Watson, HB Cal


PLAYERS OF THE WEEK

Week 1 - C. Butler, DE South Alabama
Week 2 - J. Brown, QB Texas Tech
Week 3 - N. Evans, HB Wyoming
Week 4 - N/A
Week 5 - N/A



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STAT LEADERS

PASSING
#1 - K. Allen, QB Texas A&M - 1865 Passing Yards - 18TD's 5INT's
#2 - A. Lucas, QB Okie State - 1644 Passing Yards - 9TD's 6INT's
#3 - K. Thomson, QB UNLV - 1596 Passing Yards - 13TD's 5INT's
#5 - R. Smith, QB South Alabama - 1261 Passing Yards - 9TD's, 3INT's

RUSHING
#1 - J. White, HB Texas A&M - 736 Rushing Yards - 14TD's
#2 - N. Evans, HB Wyoming - 678 Rushing Yards - 9TD's

RECEIVING
#1 - R. Seals-Jones, WR Texas A&M - 800 Receiving Yards - 13TD's
#2 - T. Stone-Davis, WR UNLV - 605 Receiving Yards - 5TD's
#3 - S. Noil, WR Texas A&M - 532 Receiving Yards - 3TD's

TACKLES
#1 - D. Roberts, MLB South Alabama - 35 Tackles 3TFL
#2 - A. Hawthorne, SS Wyoming - 30 Tackles 3 TFL
#3 - V. Davis, CB Texas A&M -28 Tackles 1TFL
#4 - D. Downs, MLB Cal - 27 Tackles 2TFL
#5 - J. Mack, OLB Texas Tech - 26 Tackles 0TFL

SACKS
#1 - C. Butler, DE South Alabama - 8 Sacks
#2 - J. Neal, DT South Alabama - 4 Sacks

INTERCEPTIONS
#2 - A. Evans, OLB Penn State - 3INT's
#2 - N. Mooney, CB South Alabama - 3INT's

KICKING
#2 - M. Anderson, K Cal - 53 Yard FG
#2 - C. Gulla, K Penn State - 53 Yard FG
#2 - A. Medley, K Tennessee - 53 Yard FG

I did add an extra day on to this week. I'm heading out of town in the morning and won't be back until Thursday evening. Thursday should be our advance day but I'll be on the road. I'll try to knock mine out this evening, if I can and everyone finishes by Wednesday I'll advance us that evening.

RanDawg wrote: I have NEVER had a defense this good . . . 99 overall . . . lock down CBs, beast DL (and backups), legit LBs and safeties. Last night playing Cal it was awesome to see DBs reacting to thrown balls. I am not used to that AT all . . . ever.

Wasted Memory wrote:

RanDawg wrote: I have NEVER had a defense this good . . . 99 overall . . . lock down CBs, beast DL (and backups), legit LBs and safeties. Last night playing Cal it was awesome to see DBs reacting to thrown balls. I am not used to that AT all . . . ever.

Ya...I agree...have u seen the numbers the CPU is putting up on me...it is sad...just said. I may actually try to play D this week and not super Sim it like I usually do, but I am player ng #5 Auburn...so not sure how long that will last before I head back to super Sim. Luckily this offense is legit. I can literally throw any route to WR Seals-Jones and he will catch it...nice.

But nonetheless, thx for rubbing it in...

Rule or not, you shouldn't be super simming on defense in the first place. Play defense just like you would have to vs a human, or take a job as an OC.

RanDawg wrote:

Wasted Memory wrote:

RanDawg wrote: I have NEVER had a defense this good . . . 99 overall . . . lock down CBs, beast DL (and backups), legit LBs and safeties. Last night playing Cal it was awesome to see DBs reacting to thrown balls. I am not used to that AT all . . . ever.

But nonetheless, thx for rubbing it in...

jsence2 wrote:Rule or not, you shouldn't be super simming on defense in the first place. Play defense just like you would have to vs a human, or take a job as an OC.

Nah...I'm good. Once Wasted makes it a rule, then I will...BUT...definitely not cuz you tell me to...LMAO

I thought it already was the rule, granted I'm not about to scan all 80 pages of the thread to check, but I also was under the impression that it was not allowed. Either way, it's only going to hurt you when have to play a user and you have had little to no recent experience playing D.

I don't think there's an actual rule on it per say. Frowned upon but that's about it. Honestly, I don't see how we could even enforce it.

RanDawg wrote:

jsence2 wrote:Rule or not, you shouldn't be super simming on defense in the first place. Play defense just like you would have to vs a human, or take a job as an OC.

Nah...I'm good. Once Wasted makes it a rule, then I will...BUT...definitely not cuz you tell me to...LMAO

If you want to admit that you can't win properly and you're too scared of good teams like Auburn, and that's how you need to win your games....that's fine by me.

Just shows that you're the "win at all costs" player I've always said you were.

Wasted Memory wrote:I don't think there's an actual rule on it per say. Frowned upon but that's about it. Honestly, I don't see how we could even enforce it.

There are ways to tell I people say, as far as it affect how stuff will display when you anyone goes in and looks at the the score by quarters of the game after the following advance, I've never verified that myself though, I like playing both sides of the ball and would only super sim if the wife was threatening my life. And even then, it's not certain

I'd be willing to bet that everyone in here at some point had super simmed for whatever reason. Personally, I don't have a huge issue with it. Believe it'll bite you eventually.

However, if the consensus for the group is not to do it, we can make that a rule.

I thought I'd seen it all on NCAA 14....and then I saw this

fsupenguin wrote:

Wasted Memory wrote:I don't think there's an actual rule on it per say. Frowned upon but that's about it. Honestly, I don't see how we could even enforce it.

There are ways to tell I people say, as far as it affect how stuff will display when you anyone goes in and looks at the the score by quarters of the game after the following advance, I've never verified that myself though, I like playing both sides of the ball and would only super sim if the wife was threatening my life. And even then, it's not certain

That is one way, and there are a few others as well.

And there's a diff between using it once in a while (short on time, etc) and using it the way Ran obviously is.

But like I said....win at all costs.

i super sim D... ...

I super sim D when I'm up big. and I don't think super simming should be outlawed.

texasfan4444 wrote:I super sim D when I'm up big. and I don't think super simming should be outlawed.

That's why your suppose to run clock on offense when up big, but really what I think the conversation is about using it as standard method. I don't care for it in any situation, but if you are up big I have no issue with it.