Re: College Football Thread
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:43 pm
LSU gets the lamest possible bowl matchup, UCF with no McKenzie Milton.
Gross
Gross
Backup seemed solid yesterday.shel311 wrote:LSU gets the lamest possible bowl matchup, UCF with no McKenzie Milton.
Gross
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Backup seemed solid yesterday.shel311 wrote:LSU gets the lamest possible bowl matchup, UCF with no McKenzie Milton.
Gross
GeorgesGoons wrote:I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.
Washington played Bama year before last.GeorgesGoons wrote:I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.
If CFP went to 8 people still bitch and want 12. It ain’t perfect but at least it’s not decided by a CPU. College football is such a different animal it’s never gonna be perfect.GeorgesGoons wrote:I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.
shel311 wrote:Ohio St was in 2 seasons ago, I think.
yeah but you'd know whatd be better than 40 useless bowls? playoffs.BFiVL wrote:If CFP went to 8 people still bitch and want 12. It ain’t perfect but at least it’s not decided by a CPU. College football is such a different animal it’s never gonna be perfect.GeorgesGoons wrote:I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.
Uuaww wrote:yeah but you'd know whatd be better than 40 useless bowls? playoffs.BFiVL wrote:If CFP went to 8 people still bitch and want 12. It ain’t perfect but at least it’s not decided by a CPU. College football is such a different animal it’s never gonna be perfect.GeorgesGoons wrote:I hope LSU shits the bed. Just so there can be a real conversation about expanding the playoff picture. No B1G representative for the 3rd year in a row. Not sure on PAC12.
If there was 8 teams, every conference could get a team, plus best group of 5 team and 2 wildcards...
Alabama vs Washington
Clemson vs UCF
Notre Dame vs Ohio St
Oklahoma vs Georgia
I would watch the hell of those.
That's what we have now.Uuaww wrote:yeah but you'd know whatd be better than 40 useless bowls? playoffs.
im not talking about fixing anything. bowl games are just useless to me. If it isn't the playoff, I don't care. Playoff just gets me more games I want to actually watch.BFiVL wrote:You are never gonna have equality in CFB. I would not put UCF in over Washington and that’s what would have happened this year. PAC 12 champ left out over a AAC champ. Still will be bitching because of scheduling, conf, etc.
Uuaww wrote:im not talking about fixing anything. bowl games are just useless to me. If it isn't the playoff, I don't care. Playoff just gets me more games I want to actually watch.BFiVL wrote:You are never gonna have equality in CFB. I would not put UCF in over Washington and that’s what would have happened this year. PAC 12 champ left out over a AAC champ. Still will be bitching because of scheduling, conf, etc.
Start gambling. I want MORE BOWL GAMES. All teams 4-8 and above should go bowling!!!!!!!!!!Uuaww wrote:BFiVL wrote:bowl games are just useless to me.
what they need to do is standardize scheduling. 9 game conference schedules. 1 FCS max, 1 Group of 5, 1 Power 5 minimum.shel311 wrote:If you go to 8 teams, I still think you take the top 8 teams, no auto bids for winning a conference as that ignores 2/3rds of the season's out of conference games.
Also, I doubt they would, but if you got 8 and you keep the 1st round games at the top 4 seeds' stadiums, that would put an emphasis on playing for seeding and likely reduce some of that likely elimination of tough OOC matchups.
So the alternative is half the teams play for practically no reason other than conference bragging rights?BFiVL wrote:Uuaww wrote:im not talking about fixing anything. bowl games are just useless to me. If it isn't the playoff, I don't care. Playoff just gets me more games I want to actually watch.BFiVL wrote:You are never gonna have equality in CFB. I would not put UCF in over Washington and that’s what would have happened this year. PAC 12 champ left out over a AAC champ. Still will be bitching because of scheduling, conf, etc.
To me you if expand the playoff you are going to see elimination of conf champ games and any OOC games of substance during regular season. No Thanks.
DRiccio21 wrote:So the alternative is half the teams play for practically no reason other than conference bragging rights?BFiVL wrote:Uuaww wrote:im not talking about fixing anything. bowl games are just useless to me. If it isn't the playoff, I don't care. Playoff just gets me more games I want to actually watch.BFiVL wrote:You are never gonna have equality in CFB. I would not put UCF in over Washington and that’s what would have happened this year. PAC 12 champ left out over a AAC champ. Still will be bitching because of scheduling, conf, etc.
To me you if expand the playoff you are going to see elimination of conf champ games and any OOC games of substance during regular season. No Thanks.
8 has its issues like everything but at least at that point you “shouldn’t “ ever have an issue where an undefeated team is left out. The whole “4 best” or “8 best” subjective stuff is such a slap in the face to playing games. Why bother having a 4 team playoff? We all know Bama is the #1 team let’s just crown them.