Page 12 of 15
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:35 pm
by shel311
Anybody notice any bogus rumors in the free agent offseason tracker, where it says you're rumored to be interested in one of the top 25 guys, but you haven't offered him anything?
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:41 pm
by trendon
shel311 wrote:Anybody notice any bogus rumors in the free agent offseason tracker, where it says you're rumored to be interested in one of the top 25 guys, but you haven't offered him anything?
Yeah, I was supposedly interested in Pepin. I don't even think I clicked on his profile.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:42 pm
by brwnbear
shel311 wrote:brwnbear wrote: Why would you penalize those of us who do?
So I can draft in peace.
You would draft the exact same way. With the OSA ratings (the same one the utility uses). This is a non-issue.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:48 pm
by Seeitsaveit13
brwnbear wrote:Bernie32 wrote:Please, please do not get rid of scouts. IF you do, everyone will have all the same info and points of view. It will get boring quick, at least for me it will. We are suppose to be simulating GM's. They have scouts and data. They take into account both and make a decision.
+1
If you dont want to use scouts. Dont use them. Why would you penalize those of us who do?
+2. If you don't want to use them, don't use them.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:05 pm
by plasma1896
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:brwnbear wrote:Bernie32 wrote:Please, please do not get rid of scouts. IF you do, everyone will have all the same info and points of view. It will get boring quick, at least for me it will. We are suppose to be simulating GM's. They have scouts and data. They take into account both and make a decision.
+1
If you dont want to use scouts. Dont use them. Why would you penalize those of us who do?
+2. If you don't want to use them, don't use them.
+3
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:07 pm
by nick
ya!!! if u guys dont wanna use them dont use them. jeez
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:15 pm
by brett11253
yea. stick with scouts.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:20 pm
by Baker
plasma1896 wrote:Seeitsaveit13 wrote:brwnbear wrote:Bernie32 wrote:Please, please do not get rid of scouts. IF you do, everyone will have all the same info and points of view. It will get boring quick, at least for me it will. We are suppose to be simulating GM's. They have scouts and data. They take into account both and make a decision.
+1
If you dont want to use scouts. Dont use them. Why would you penalize those of us who do?
+2. If you don't want to use them, don't use them.
+3
+4
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:47 pm
by trendon
Well, no need to vote on that one since it won't enough to overturn things as I would have also voted to keep scouts on. I just don't pay one iota of attention to overall and potential rating. Not one. 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:54 pm
by Baker
trendon wrote: 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
So what are you going off of for your rotation ratings??? Just curious.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:55 pm
by trendon
Baker wrote:trendon wrote: 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
So what are you going off of for your rotation ratings??? Just curious.
They are my ratings. Not yours. Snoop.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:56 pm
by Baker
trendon wrote:Baker wrote:trendon wrote: 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
So what are you going off of for your rotation ratings??? Just curious.
They are my ratings. Not yours. Snoop.
cool...glad you aren't my scout.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:57 pm
by trendon
Baker wrote:trendon wrote:Baker wrote:trendon wrote: 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
So what are you going off of for your rotation ratings??? Just curious.
They are my ratings. Not yours. Snoop.
cool...glad you aren't my scout.
Albany's reign is over. MUHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:59 pm
by Baker
trendon wrote:Baker wrote:trendon wrote:Baker wrote:trendon wrote: 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
So what are you going off of for your rotation ratings??? Just curious.
They are my ratings. Not yours. Snoop.
cool...glad you aren't my scout.
Albany's reign is over. MUHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
New York has had no reign HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:01 pm
by trendon
Baker wrote:
New York has had no reign HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Inaugural champions and second to Albany in playoff wins, playa! That's a reign.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:02 pm
by Baker
If your happy with 2nd...I'm happy for ya!
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:09 pm
by shel311
trendon wrote:Inaugural champions
*
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:09 pm
by trendon
shel311 wrote:trendon wrote:Inaugural champions
*
Asterisk, my ass. Jason Stillwell 4 LYFE
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:20 pm
by shel311
trendon wrote:shel311 wrote:trendon wrote:Inaugural champions
*
Asterisk, my ass. Jason Stillwell 4 LYFE
I have it on good authority that that sim was run 17 times in order to get the desired result. Sheltown was THAT good!!!
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:37 pm
by Cnasty
shel311 wrote:Sheltown was THAT good!!!
Key
Word