Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:54 am
Speaking of soft!Matt90210 wrote:
Busy, Weasel. Real busy. I was a double major in college but dropped one of them when I had 3 quarters left (don't know why).
Speaking of soft!Matt90210 wrote:
Busy, Weasel. Real busy. I was a double major in college but dropped one of them when I had 3 quarters left (don't know why).
Matt90210 wrote:ajalves wrote:how does that make him soft? im not saying he isnt soft, but come on, lets get real
It doesn't make him soft. Gasol has always been soft. This just adds to it. He has 2 inches and position on Blake. That gif should have never happened.
Smarter, yes.ajalves wrote:you're smarter than this matty
I guess the technical answer is yes. But he'd have to keep having more and more and more screwups be leaked like this.sammy33 wrote:Have to ask the question. With everything going on in Orlando this season, is it possible that Howard has passed (or will pass) James on the hated scale? A total mess.
Hollywood!!!sammy33 wrote:Lakerland, in general, seems to undervalue him.
its not a coincidence the 3 probably best true big men (howard, bynum, cousins) in the NBA are nut cases. these guys have been babied because of their size their whole life.Matt90210 wrote:Bynum needs to grow up
0%ReignOnU wrote:Sounds like Odom is out in Dallas... odds that he's in a Laker jersey for the playoffs?
Isn't the rule that the only team a player can't sign with after being released is the team that traded him during that season?DRiccio21 wrote:he wouldn't be eligible to play on another team for the playoffs.
if i understand the rule correctly, you have to be on an active roster by march 23rd to be eligible to play in the playoffs with that teamshel311 wrote:Isn't the rule that the only team a player can't sign with after being released is the team that traded him during that season?DRiccio21 wrote:he wouldn't be eligible to play on another team for the playoffs.
Gotcha, I'm thinking of a different rule.DRiccio21 wrote:if i understand the rule correctly, you have to be on an active roster by march 23rd to be eligible to play in the playoffs with that teamshel311 wrote:Isn't the rule that the only team a player can't sign with after being released is the team that traded him during that season?DRiccio21 wrote:he wouldn't be eligible to play on another team for the playoffs.
yup, thats true too... like Fisher wasn't able to sign with the Lakers after he was released.shel311 wrote:Gotcha, I'm thinking of a different rule.DRiccio21 wrote:if i understand the rule correctly, you have to be on an active roster by march 23rd to be eligible to play in the playoffs with that teamshel311 wrote:Isn't the rule that the only team a player can't sign with after being released is the team that traded him during that season?DRiccio21 wrote:he wouldn't be eligible to play on another team for the playoffs.
I'm thinking of the one where they stopped guys from being traded, then bought out, then 30 days later going back to their original teams as part of an "understood" deal.
The new CBA has some sort of rule in place that says a guy traded can't return to the team that traded him for that season or for a calendar year, or something like that.
What a little bitch.DRiccio21 wrote:if i understand the rule correctly, you have to be on an active roster by march 23rd to be eligible to play in the playoffs with that teamshel311 wrote:Isn't the rule that the only team a player can't sign with after being released is the team that traded him during that season?DRiccio21 wrote:he wouldn't be eligible to play on another team for the playoffs.
he's amazing.ajalves wrote:you see the pass by Artest at the end of the Lakers game?![]()
![]()