Page 3 of 4

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:00 pm
by Cnasty
Hoos wrote:Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, like anybody is going to believe that. Biffy would be in that tank about 1.5 seconds after the match started.
Damn, even I remember that. Him and Schoola were tank bitches

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:35 am
by Toro
BF2 seems to have a good balance with vehicles...I like it that you need to communicate with your squad to be successful. 3 should be building on this.

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:04 pm
by ajalves
autiger730 wrote:COD is going down.
you might want to check out the 6 minute MW3 trailer before you say that....

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:15 pm
by autiger730
ajalves wrote:
autiger730 wrote:COD is going down.
you might want to check out the 6 minute MW3 trailer before you say that....
saw it

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:24 pm
by ajalves
autiger730 wrote:
ajalves wrote:
autiger730 wrote:COD is going down.
you might want to check out the 6 minute MW3 trailer before you say that....
saw it
then you'd have to agree they look almost the same

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:24 pm
by Hoos
COD is far from getting owned. It will out sell BF3. The difference is that COD always does MP better than anybody else. You are in action almost immediately thanks the map designs.

Other devs have borrowed heavily from COD but nobody has improved on what they do for MP. BF3 looks great and hopefully will be great but until they can match what COD does for MP then they will always be behind.

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:29 pm
by Cnasty
It must be better because getting into a game "instantly" in cod was not it's strong suit and actually the most annoying part.


Tha was about 3 weeks though :)

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:34 pm
by Hoos
^ I meant once the game starts you find action right away.

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:01 pm
by Hoos
Skyrim is moving up my list. I just wish every game didn't have to come out in Nov. :x

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:07 pm
by BIGmike
Hoos wrote:Skyrim is moving up my list. I just wish every game didn't have to come out in Nov. :x
Oblivion was a very good game so I can only imagine Skyrim being better.

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:29 pm
by Toro
Bethesda does good work.

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:43 pm
by BIGmike
Mass Effect 3 also looks amazing. The second one kept my attention the whole way through and with your actions from the previous game carrying over into the new game...awesomeness.

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:58 pm
by Matt90210
Bioshock is gonna be off the charts

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:09 pm
by nick
Matt90210 wrote:Bioshock is gonna be off the charts
off the hizzy?

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:19 pm
by autiger730
ajalves wrote:
autiger730 wrote:
ajalves wrote:
autiger730 wrote:COD is going down.
you might want to check out the 6 minute MW3 trailer before you say that....
saw it
then you'd have to agree they look almost the same
Two words: destructible enviroments

Campers have a hard time finding a spot when you can call in mortars, shoot a barrage of shells with a tank, or use C4 to drop their cover. And by cover I mean the entire building.

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:20 pm
by ajalves
autiger730 wrote: Two words: destructible enviroments

Campers have a hard time finding a spot when you can call in mortars, shoot a barrage of shells with a tank, or use C4 to drop their cover. And by cover I mean the entire building.
show me one online that doesnt cause a ton of lag, then i'll concede

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:48 am
by autiger730
ajalves wrote:
autiger730 wrote: Two words: destructible enviroments

Campers have a hard time finding a spot when you can call in mortars, shoot a barrage of shells with a tank, or use C4 to drop their cover. And by cover I mean the entire building.
show me one online that doesnt cause a ton of lag, then i'll concede
I had less problems with lag on Bad Company 2 than on MW2 or BLOPS. Played that on XBL though.

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:31 am
by cougnix
autiger730 wrote:
ajalves wrote:
autiger730 wrote: Two words: destructible enviroments

Campers have a hard time finding a spot when you can call in mortars, shoot a barrage of shells with a tank, or use C4 to drop their cover. And by cover I mean the entire building.
show me one online that doesnt cause a ton of lag, then i'll concede
I had less problems with lag on Bad Company 2 than on MW2 or BLOPS. Played that on XBL though.
Same, hardly ever had a laggy room on BF2. I will be getting both most likely, but might only get one for PS3 and play my sons for Xbox.

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:35 am
by ajalves
wasnt laggy because there were only 10,000 people playing

and to be honest, BLOPS lag is terrible. However, MW2 wasnt bad at all

Re: E3 2011 Discussion

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:46 am
by cougnix
ajalves wrote:wasnt laggy because there were only 10,000 people playing

and to be honest, BLOPS lag is terrible. However, MW2 wasnt bad at all
That is all I care about...

MW2 was just boring.

If MW3 has dedicated servers like the rumors are saying, then I think we will all be pleased.

PS: Played Socom 4 last night...Holy lord the game is horrible. Spawn camping is essentially all you see in the games, no matter what the objective and 90% of kills are head shots. Stupid ass Zipper...