Page 3 of 4
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:21 pm
by kdog36
shel311 wrote:DRiccio21 wrote:nick, where do you see that?
I'm guessing he was caught messin around with mickelson's wife in the locker room, Phil walked in and a fight ensued.
But really, why in the world would Tiger be DQ'ed???
He violated rule 25.3.6 V. 4 of section 10.3.4.6.1 halfway down the page.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:29 pm
by nick
signed an illegal scorecard. didn't know he had a 2 shot penalty? my golf friend said this.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:35 pm
by kdog36
nick wrote:signed an illegal scorecard. didn't know he had a 2 shot penalty? my golf friend said this.
correct but the 2 stroke pen was because of the drop.
the discussion of being Dq'd was because he signed an incorrect scorecard. He was not Dq'd because it was decided that he was not aware of the infraction at the time he signed it. Which bears the arguement if it was not brought to his attention at that moment of the infraction should it even be a penalty to begin with.?
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:46 pm
by nick
for the record, i was asked to remain out of the thread cause i hate golf and think its stupid as fuck, so i must apologize for double posting about the DQ
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:13 pm
by autiger730
The real reason he was not DQ'd was because he is Tiger. If this was almost anyone else, it would be a different ruling. Gotta get those ratings today and tomorrow.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:23 pm
by shel311
autiger730 wrote:The real reason he was not DQ'd was because he is Tiger. If this was almost anyone else, it would be a different ruling. Gotta get those ratings today and tomorrow.
Uhh, they originally said he was Ok, then gave him the penalty after listening to his post round press conference.
Thats basically the opposite of what you're saying lol.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:25 pm
by nick
autiger730 wrote:The real reason he was not DQ'd was because he is Tiger. If this was almost anyone else, it would be a different ruling. Gotta get those ratings today and tomorrow.
lol pretty much this.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:32 pm
by autiger730
shel311 wrote:autiger730 wrote:The real reason he was not DQ'd was because he is Tiger. If this was almost anyone else, it would be a different ruling. Gotta get those ratings today and tomorrow.
Uhh, they originally said he was Ok, then gave him the penalty after listening to his post round press conference.
Thats basically the opposite of what you're saying lol.
No, the rule he broke calls for a DQ. But, there is another rule that says it is evaluated on an individual basis and the committee can enforce penalty strokes in place of a DQ.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:38 pm
by shel311
autiger730 wrote:shel311 wrote:autiger730 wrote:The real reason he was not DQ'd was because he is Tiger. If this was almost anyone else, it would be a different ruling. Gotta get those ratings today and tomorrow.
Uhh, they originally said he was Ok, then gave him the penalty after listening to his post round press conference.
Thats basically the opposite of what you're saying lol.
No, the rule he broke calls for a DQ. But, there is another rule that says it is evaluated on an individual basis and the committee can enforce penalty strokes in place of a DQ.
Actually yes.
Thats per Tiger, himself.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:13 pm
by autiger730
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 3:13 pm
by Uuaww
So the best stream I have to today is a British stream. Listening to Scottish announcers for golf is awesome
Also the lack Tiger coverage is pretty cool...
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:07 pm
by Uuaww
also commercial free in england.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:47 pm
by VeniVediV1ci
DRiccio21 wrote:Tiger might get dq'd.
i don't get what the debate would be? if he did something wrong, DQ him. if he didn't, why would this even be brought up?
based on every tournament i played growing up, the player would have been DQ'd. We should call it the Tiger Rule
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:50 pm
by VeniVediV1ci
shel311 wrote:Wow, Rick Reilly just got through with some incoherent babbling lol.
He said the rule was fair and no one in the press room after Tiger's round questioned it, but said he still felt Tiger should withdraw himself.
Then he mentioned the new rule about signing an unknown scorecard and 1 minute later backtracked on saying Tiger should withdraw since the new rule is in place.
It was magical television.
what in the world has Rick Reilly done to be an expert in anything? Other than sign a ridiculous contract because ESPN is fucking stupid
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 4:58 pm
by Whittness10
I'm watching the live feed at work on Masters.com. Nice setup they got. Very clear picture and no glitching.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:17 pm
by The_Niddler
Whittness10 wrote:I'm watching the live feed at work on Masters.com. Nice setup they got. Very clear picture and no glitching.
yeah, the website and the app are both top notch this year. looks really good.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:36 pm
by OracleHCR
It still amazes me every year how beautiful this course is.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:21 pm
by DRiccio21
Tiger could use those 2 strokes.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:38 pm
by shel311
DRiccio21 wrote:Tiger could use those 2 strokes.
He basically lost 4 strokes cause he hit the flag.
I know the whole game of inches thing, but one of those inches doesn't usually cost you 4 strokes.
Re: The Masters
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:57 pm
by DRiccio21
what an 18th!