NCAA Dynasty League
https://onlinedynasty.net/forum/
YESSSSSSSSCnasty wrote:With it being as close as it is, are we good with me determining when to intervene versus hard set rules and numbers which are complicated for most and inaccurate depending on where we go with the parameters?
I would consult with the owner(s) prior to denying and give feedback.
The more restrictions we put on the worse it is.shel311 wrote:Yes, anything that doesn't allow this to go through will be best for the league.Cnasty wrote:With it being as close as it is, are we good with me determining when to intervene versus hard set rules and numbers which are complicated for most and inaccurate depending on where we go with the parameters?
I would consult with the owner(s) prior to denying and give feedback.
This would be goodwdoupis wrote:YESSSSSSSSCnasty wrote:With it being as close as it is, are we good with me determining when to intervene versus hard set rules and numbers which are complicated for most and inaccurate depending on where we go with the parameters?
I would consult with the owner(s) prior to denying and give feedback.
no. you doing what you're doing is worse than this.Boston_Rob wrote:The more restrictions we put on the worse it is.shel311 wrote:Yes, anything that doesn't allow this to go through will be best for the league.Cnasty wrote:With it being as close as it is, are we good with me determining when to intervene versus hard set rules and numbers which are complicated for most and inaccurate depending on where we go with the parameters?
I would consult with the owner(s) prior to denying and give feedback.
Seriously what is your problem with me? Heaven forbid I have an opinion on anything without you bringing up something about my team. You don't even know how I voted, just assuming as usual. Try and be proactive and make an actual proposal with a solution rather than continue to whine and cry.nick wrote:no. you doing what you're doing is worse than this.Boston_Rob wrote:The more restrictions we put on the worse it is.shel311 wrote:Yes, anything that doesn't allow this to go through will be best for the league.Cnasty wrote:With it being as close as it is, are we good with me determining when to intervene versus hard set rules and numbers which are complicated for most and inaccurate depending on where we go with the parameters?
I would consult with the owner(s) prior to denying and give feedback.
Insert spreadsheet...Boston_Rob wrote:Seriously what is your problem with me? Heaven forbid I have an opinion on anything without you bringing up something about my team. You don't even know how I voted, just assuming as usual. Try and be proactive and make an actual proposal with a solution rather than continue to whine and cry.nick wrote:no. you doing what you're doing is worse than this.Boston_Rob wrote:The more restrictions we put on the worse it is.shel311 wrote:Yes, anything that doesn't allow this to go through will be best for the league.Cnasty wrote:With it being as close as it is, are we good with me determining when to intervene versus hard set rules and numbers which are complicated for most and inaccurate depending on where we go with the parameters?
I would consult with the owner(s) prior to denying and give feedback.
Or quit.
The eye testDRWebs wrote:What does Corey use as his parameters to make his decision then?
Don't you wear glasses?Cnasty wrote:The eye testDRWebs wrote:What does Corey use as his parameters to make his decision then?
there's 0 problem with you. I'd call out anyone in the league for doing this. You unfortunately did it. Sometimes I have ot speak up to get the wheels in motion. i dont mind being the bad guy if it makes things better. If you think this is personal then by all means, but I like some realism in my game and being 160ish mil in debt, and taking on more debt, with no consequences, is not realism. Its merely the #, i dont care about debt. Everyones gonna be like max 50m in debt, but 160ish? plus taking on 70ish mil? cmon man, draw the line.Boston_Rob wrote:Seriously what is your problem with me? Heaven forbid I have an opinion on anything without you bringing up something about my team. You don't even know how I voted, just assuming as usual. Try and be proactive and make an actual proposal with a solution rather than continue to whine and cry.nick wrote:no. you doing what you're doing is worse than this.Boston_Rob wrote:The more restrictions we put on the worse it is.shel311 wrote:Yes, anything that doesn't allow this to go through will be best for the league.Cnasty wrote:With it being as close as it is, are we good with me determining when to intervene versus hard set rules and numbers which are complicated for most and inaccurate depending on where we go with the parameters?
I would consult with the owner(s) prior to denying and give feedback.
Or quit.
Don't let facts get in the way of a good storyshel311 wrote:Wasn't he replaced due to being inactive?
Like, really really inactive?
You mean alternative facts...Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Don't let facts get in the way of a good storyshel311 wrote:Wasn't he replaced due to being inactive?
Like, really really inactive?
You really have a thing for trendonnick wrote:and before people say "well theres no rule, lets draw the line" i dunno if Trendon ever told u guys how he found the players... ... they were in game.. in the players list.. that we all check when we click the tab down, and you go to players, and it showed everyone including IFAs but it didnt say this. So he was making a draft history for the start of the league going thru every name and just noticed random dudes were FAs and gave em chances. and you guys all branded him a cheater, and kicked him from the league he started, when im pretty sure he came forward and said he did it, and was not cheating and def wouldnt of done it (and stopped when figured out what was happening), but he was a cheater.
But THIS SHIT, is "well theres no rule"
fuck you
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:This would be goodwdoupis wrote:YESSSSSSSSCnasty wrote:With it being as close as it is, are we good with me determining when to intervene versus hard set rules and numbers which are complicated for most and inaccurate depending on where we go with the parameters?
I would consult with the owner(s) prior to denying and give feedback.