Holding to Minor League roster limits.

[wdoupis]

This is the problem with polls is too many people start talking ideas that have nothing to do with the poll.

This poll is simple, do we enforce roster limits. We already have a rule for this so it is yes we enforce the rule of 163 plus IC and DL guys or not.

I hate the guys that only have 5 at each level but we don’t have a rule for that. If you want to make a poll for a minimum go and do it BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS POLL!!!!!!

If someone does that and it passes then it will be the same penalty as whatever I decide for being over limits

[Wasted Memory]

Do the 163 on Opening Day and done, and i'll get on the YES train!!

I think a lot of people, not saying you shel calm down , need to go read the rules of the league. The rules you agreed to abide by when you accepted ownership of a team.

Here, here's a link to it http://onlinedynasty.net/forum/viewtopi ... 02&t=30611 to help you out.

Fourth one down. Now, why do we need to vote on this again?

[shel311]

This poll is simple, do we enforce roster limits. We already have a rule for this

So we don't need this poll then, we just need to enforce said rule.

[wdoupis]

This poll is simple, do we enforce roster limits. We already have a rule for this

So we don't need this poll then, we just need to enforce said rule.

I agree, I took this as a "do I need to actually enforce and penalize" type of poll.

[Cnasty]

Difference in the rule to the poll.

Adhere to minor league roster limits
Recognize and Enforce Organization player size

I dont care about the roster limits(I do care about the organization limits) but really care about the age as that is really detrimental to prospect growth.

[GeorgesGoons]

This poll is simple, do we enforce roster limits. We already have a rule for this

So we don't need this poll then, we just need to enforce said rule.

I agree, I took this as a "do I need to actually enforce and penalize" type of poll.

Looks like most of us think you do need to enforce it

[GeorgesGoons]

Difference in the rule to the poll.

Minor league roster limits
Organization player size

I dont care about the roster limits(I do care about the organization limits) but really care about the age as that is really detrimental to prospect growth.

create a poll and see if everyone else agrees with your stance

[Cnasty]

AJ already did for the age one.

We dont need another poll for Billy to actually fine/hold people accountable for a league rule that has been in place since near our existence.

And as Shel said, its ridiculous that one is on pace not to pass.

[shel311]

Difference in the rule to the poll.

True but still not sure how we enforce it, way too much work on the commish, and I think instead of adhering to every single levels' limits, it's easier to just do the 163, and star enforcing that.

[GeorgesGoons]

Difference in the rule to the poll.

True but still not sure how we enforce it, way too much work on the commish, and I think instead of adhering to every single levels' limits, it's easier to just do the 163, and star enforcing that.

yep

[ajalves]

This is the problem with polls is too many people start talking ideas that have nothing to do with the poll.

This poll is simple, do we enforce roster limits. We already have a rule for this so it is yes we enforce the rule of 163 plus IC and DL guys or not.

I hate the guys that only have 5 at each level but we don’t have a rule for that. If you want to make a poll for a minimum go and do it BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS POLL!!!!!!

If someone does that and it passes then it will be the same penalty as whatever I decide for being over limits

well i assume everyone is an adult. If they cant decipher a painfully simple poll question with some small side chatter then as a league we have bigger 'issues'

[wdoupis]

Difference in the rule to the poll.

True but still not sure how we enforce it, way too much work on the commish, and I think instead of adhering to every single levels' limits, it's easier to just do the 163, and star enforcing that.

This is what it would be, the overall. If you are 4 guys over in AAA and 4 guys under in AA thats your call. Its the 163 I will enforce

[wdoupis]

This is the problem with polls is too many people start talking ideas that have nothing to do with the poll.

This poll is simple, do we enforce roster limits. We already have a rule for this so it is yes we enforce the rule of 163 plus IC and DL guys or not.

I hate the guys that only have 5 at each level but we don’t have a rule for that. If you want to make a poll for a minimum go and do it BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS POLL!!!!!!

If someone does that and it passes then it will be the same penalty as whatever I decide for being over limits

well i assume everyone is an adult. If they cant decipher a painfully simple poll question with some small side chatter then as a league we have bigger 'issues'

I'd like to agree but there have already been a few guys post that they voted no as things became too confusing. I am just clarifying what you are actually voting for and don't worry about percentages and the rest of the chatter.

[DRWebs]

Probably doesn't help that half these polls were created without enabling the revote option

[ajalves]

all good William! thanks for the fast rollovers and all the good commish work. Keep doing what your doing. I'm glad to be back

[wdoupis]

all good William! thanks for the fast rollovers and all the good commish work. Keep doing what your doing. I'm glad to be back

And we are glad you are back!!!!

[shel311]

This is the problem with polls is too many people start talking ideas that have nothing to do with the poll.

This poll is simple, do we enforce roster limits. We already have a rule for this so it is yes we enforce the rule of 163 plus IC and DL guys or not.

I hate the guys that only have 5 at each level but we don’t have a rule for that. If you want to make a poll for a minimum go and do it BUT THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS POLL!!!!!!

If someone does that and it passes then it will be the same penalty as whatever I decide for being over limits

well i assume everyone is an adult. If they cant decipher a painfully simple poll question with some small side chatter then as a league we have bigger 'issues'

No offense to anyone here, but in the past we have voted on things, and then 2-3 pages in either the OP or the commish changes the voting criteria somewhat from what the OP originally stated, so we do have a precedent for it.


It's not even done in a bad or wrong way, fwiw. Like in this thread, on page 2 or whatever, Billy comes in and changes it from limit to every single roster to policing the 163 total. That's why I went with No, after a while it wasn't really clear what exactly was being voted on even though the OP was very clear.


Unfortunately, now that I know it's 163, i'd vote YES but the OP didn't leave the option to change the vote.

[shel311]

Probably doesn't help that half these polls were created without enabling the revote option

Winter Meetings topic - All Winter Meetings topics need the option to change your vote to be official!!!

[Cnasty]

Probably doesn't help that half these polls were created without enabling the revote option

Fixed for them

[shel311]

Updated...long live Rule 163!!!