NCAA Dynasty League
https://onlinedynasty.net/forum/
If he didn't charge you there would much more than 1 person complaining about this.Hammerin' Hank wrote:Biggest cop out answer there is. You didn't need to charge me and you know it. But hey I'm always gonna get Billy'd.wdoupis wrote: The rule is the rule
Like 28 or so dudes, give or take.GeorgesGoons wrote:If he didn't charge you there would much more than 1 person complaining about this.
Ah shit, my bad dude. I thought you had 27 guys there.Hammerin' Hank wrote:You didn't need to charge me and you know it.
wdoupis wrote:Ah shit, my bad dude. I thought you had 27 guys there.Hammerin' Hank wrote:You didn't need to charge me and you know it.
Anything good come out of the press conference last night?nick wrote:wdoupis wrote:Ah shit, my bad dude. I thought you had 27 guys there.Hammerin' Hank wrote:You didn't need to charge me and you know it.
What is your hard on for us lately?nick wrote:working for Nashville you have to highly favor tools.
nick wrote:working for Nashville you have to highly favor tools.
Short livedwdoupis wrote:Frenchie makes it to #1!!!!!!!
"Happy to help!"RanDawg wrote:Thank you to OCD and SF for allowing Houston to go 6-1 during opening week...on the road. As bad as we have been for so long, we REALLY appreciate it.
Maybe I should also thank wdoupis for enforcing a very simple rule that caused SF to pissy and to purposely throw 2 out of 3 games. Much appreciate, bossRanDawg wrote:Thank you to OCD and SF for allowing Houston to go 6-1 during opening week...on the road. As bad as we have been for so long, we REALLY appreciate it.
You will never win this league. NEVER!!!!!Kslaze wrote:I have to say it was nice taking 2 of 3 from Richmond in the first week at their home. Got to see some of my former prospects as well.
He's right on this. I had an export that didn't go through. I was obviously mad, but I didn't blame him. I think the only thing I got mad about was the OD roster was a total mess (not blaming him for it either, because as someone who does sims in another league, it's a massive pain in the ass to set someone else's roster). I know way better from other leagues too to never wait til the day off to do stuff (roster cuts, Rule V protect, extensions, stuff like that).wdoupis wrote:I think the last guy who got fined was Roggie and I talk to him quite a bit and he is the first one I go to when there is some weird OOTP issue as he has a ton of knowledge and works with the OOTP beta team. The rule is the rule. I know you always think you are the victim and I knew you'd react this way but the rule is quite simple, its extremely effective, and I'd enforce it on anyone.
Have done multiple times. HIgh end guys should NOT have major variances. I get a random player that one scout thinks is great while others don't (and doesn't have the stats to match it or plays against super weak competition, like a Joey Votto in real life), but top 10 projected guys should never be seen as a 20/30 by some scouts.The_Niddler wrote:wdoupis wrote:I think the last guy who got fined was Roggie and I talk to him quite a bit and he is the first one I go to when there is some weird OOTP issue as he has a ton of knowledge and works with the OOTP beta team.
Had no idea Roggie works with the beta team.
Roggie, tell them to fix this shit with the scout variances.
As has been mentioned several times, I get that 1 scout may see a player as a 20/80 potential and then another will see him as a 20/65 potential.
Or maybe the HR hitting where 1 scout may see a guy as having HR potential as 75 and the next sees him as having HR potential as 60, but how in the hell does one scout see him having HR potential as 75 and another will see him as having 3?
I mean, you know if a guy is a HR hitter or not. I get that not every scout will rate his HR potential as the exact same number, but it has to be closer than what the game does.
Drives me nutsRoggie wrote: but it's the 1 for one person and 78 for another
Utterly stupid. I remember the 3nd draft i was in in this league, 3 of the top 4 picks were 35 potential or lower according to my scout, and basically everyone else's scout likes them. Insane.shel311 wrote:Drives me nutsRoggie wrote: but it's the 1 for one person and 78 for another