Bernie32 wrote:nick wrote:trendon wrote:Jaime Cruz, 2,500th hit.
Q about Cruz. is Bernie on the hook for the remainder of that circumvented contract because he has a 41 yr old signed through 2031 (7 more yrs) at a 12 mil/yr price. Quite clear that he made this offer so he could get less money/yr knowing no player is actually gonna play til theyre 48-50 and thus he got cruz for much cheaper than market value.
If not, I'm signing all my guys til theyre 50 for cheap.
edit: hes in year 3 of 10 of this deal, he signed it when he was 39 and 200ish days. lol ya, no player is signing a 10 yr deal at 39, and no team is offering that without being instantly fired.
again? Joe Telvest knocked in almost 100 runs at 42, why can't Cruz produce til later than that? Even at nearly 42, Cruz is still producing. wOBA of .346 and OPS+ of 122. Both would be 3rd on your team. But even at that rate, I would say 12 mil per is right around market value, if not overpaying for the production received. We got guys sitting in free agency right now that could produce more than that for half the money, but remain unsigned. And let's talk about instantly fired. I think a GM would be instantly fired if a player says to him, "I want
X amount" and the GM says, "No we're going to give you
3X".
I dont think you quite understand what I mean.
If in real life, a GM gave a player at the age of 39, a 10 yr contract. That GM probably wouldnt get his hand on the paper to sign it before he was instantly fired by the owner. Instantly. Why? Because unlike a video game which is random, a real life person getting a contract til hges almost 50 wont retire because he will continue to get that money as long as hes playing or bought out. In this game, in 2 seasons (cruz is a 44/80 and dropped 40 pts in 1.5 yrs so i wouldnt even say 2 yrs) when Cruz retires, you dont owe anymore of that 5 yrs 60 mil that remains that Cruz signed, and thus you got him at a much cheaper value. I could offer a 40 yr old a 1 yr 3 mil deal, or a 10 yr 10 mil deal and he'll take the 10 mil cause 10 > 3, but in reality im paying him 1 mil/yr til he retires cause hes 40, so if he retires in 2 yrs, instead of 2/6 like he probably would of wanted, i got him for 2/2 because in the sims mind I just offered him 10.
But in this game, you dont become liable for these kinda circumventions because now you got a player who sees 120 mil over 10, when his digi self has 3 maybe 4 yrs left in him. If you dont feel thats circumventing of a salary then we'll agree to disagree.
In the NHL Kovie signed a 17 yr contract and they got reprimanded and lost draft picks. You signed a 39 yr old to a 10 yr contract... Kovie when he signed woulda been a Devil til 44, and that was frowned upon, and you got a guy whos gonna be on your team til hes 49!
Also 12 mil for the best hitter in NDLB history is fair value? Maybe on an arb contract...