Re: 2047 Season Thread-Oh Canada!
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 8:27 am
Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.
No, spring training doesn't effect that.LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.
Actually Yea, they do lose the option.Boston_Rob wrote:No, spring training doesn't effect that.LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.
Do they?shel311 wrote:Actually Yea, they do lose the option.Boston_Rob wrote:No, spring training doesn't effect that.LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.
The point is so that you can't stash them in the minors forever. They get rule 5 eligible then on the 40 man to burn through their options so eventually you gotta call them up or release them.
yes, unless they are non-roster invitees. Shel is explaining it correct. Guys usually become rule 5 elig. at age 22-23 ish. once that happens to keep them on your team you have to put them on your 40 man. after that you get 3 more years of stashing them in your minors before on the 4th year you have to waive them to get him back in; thus allowing every other team a shot at putting them on their major league team.Boston_Rob wrote:Do they?shel311 wrote:Actually Yea, they do lose the option.Boston_Rob wrote:No, spring training doesn't effect that.LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.
The point is so that you can't stash them in the minors forever. They get rule 5 eligible then on the 40 man to burn through their options so eventually you gotta call them up or release them.
I get it. Tracking like a SCUD!Uuaww wrote:yes, unless they are non-roster invitees. Shel is explaining it correct. Guys usually become rule 5 elig. at age 22-23 ish. once that happens to keep them on your team you have to put them on your 40 man. after that you get 3 more years of stashing them in your minors before on the 4th year you have to waive them to get him back in; thus allowing every other team a shot at putting them on their major league team.Boston_Rob wrote:Do they?shel311 wrote:Actually Yea, they do lose the option.Boston_Rob wrote:No, spring training doesn't effect that.LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.
The point is so that you can't stash them in the minors forever. They get rule 5 eligible then on the 40 man to burn through their options so eventually you gotta call them up or release them.
at the start of spring training, everyone on 40 man is brought up to start this clock.
He needs to go back to North Korea with that shitty attitude!Uuaww wrote:EVERYONE wants Lou now lol. Get me that sweet delicious comp pick!
Also don't bother giving him multiple years, he won't want it. Been trying that a few sims. He wants a one year deal and then promptly asks for an extension of about 18-22 mil per.
sad to see him likely go. He is by far the best IFA I have ever gotten from my yearly binge.Boston_Rob wrote:He needs to go back to North Korea with that shitty attitude!Uuaww wrote:EVERYONE wants Lou now lol. Get me that sweet delicious comp pick!
Also don't bother giving him multiple years, he won't want it. Been trying that a few sims. He wants a one year deal and then promptly asks for an extension of about 18-22 mil per.
I feel like we go through this once a year....LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.
I am so glad we tradedSeeitsaveit13 wrote:I feel like we go through this once a year....LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.
Why do you have a Louisville logo?Boston_Rob wrote:I am so glad we tradedSeeitsaveit13 wrote:I feel like we go through this once a year....LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.I see you in a whole new light now.
Shut up. Nobody likes you.Seeitsaveit13 wrote:I feel like we go through this once a year....LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.
Mind your own business!Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Why do you have a Louisville logo?Boston_Rob wrote:I am so glad we tradedSeeitsaveit13 wrote:I feel like we go through this once a year....LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.I see you in a whole new light now.
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Why do you have a Louisville logo?Boston_Rob wrote:I am so glad we tradedSeeitsaveit13 wrote:I feel like we go through this once a year....LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.I see you in a whole new light now.
Be nice! Sheesh. What a Cauc...LetsGoPeay wrote:Shut up. Nobody likes you.Seeitsaveit13 wrote:I feel like we go through this once a year....LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.
I just liked the "L" being the first letter of my last name.Wasted Memory wrote:Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Why do you have a Louisville logo?Boston_Rob wrote:I am so glad we tradedSeeitsaveit13 wrote:I feel like we go through this once a year....LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.I see you in a whole new light now.
Huh, I just assumed it meant Loser.
And I don't want to have a beer with you either.Seeitsaveit13 wrote:Be nice! Sheesh. What a Cauc...LetsGoPeay wrote:Shut up. Nobody likes you.Seeitsaveit13 wrote:I feel like we go through this once a year....LetsGoPeay wrote:Is that going to cause them to lose a year of their minor league options? If so, that really sucks.