NDL Forum

Haters gonna hate!

shel311 wrote:

SuperJakeB wrote:Oh i wasn't singling out anyone that is a overall view of some games this season

Not you, dummy

I actually didn't even notice your post lol.

I think he was referring to me, but i'm done now. Carry on...

I think this is the most fun part of the season! Helps me plan my OOC for next season when I see everyone's derogatory remarks regarding others playing techniques.

Thats right when ya play me ya get a free side of Mac n Cheese. Atleast ya got something to snack on when ya play me! That will be my advertisment for next season!

UclaMac wrote:Thats right when ya play me ya get a free side of Mac n Cheese. Atleast ya got something to snack on when ya play me! That will be my advertisment for next season!

+1

cut the bullshit. This isnt the place.

Yeah, the polls are tricky. I am not saying I belonged in the top 10..but at 3 losses and winner of the Pac 12 beating all the ranked teams in the Pac 12 except Stanford...I can't believe the voters wouldn't put me ahead of UCLA...doesn't make sense, I think the massey had me theire, but both polls didn't, I was winner of like 8 straight too. Realistic voting would have me ahead of them after winning the pac 12 as well as they had 2 losses. It's not a big deal, cause I got the same bowl I would of got regardless and I will probably lose that bowl game haha.


and I dominated you Marcus and UCLA! )

xLiQx wrote:Yeah, the polls are tricky. I am not saying I belonged in the top 10..but at 3 losses and winner of the Pac 12 beating all the ranked teams in the Pac 12 except Stanford...I can't believe the voters wouldn't put me ahead of UCLA...doesn't make sense, I think the massey had me theire, but both polls didn't, I was winner of like 8 straight too. Realistic voting would have me ahead of them after winning the pac 12 as well as they had 2 losses. It's not a big deal, cause I got the same bowl I would of got regardless and I will probably lose that bowl game haha.


and I dominated you Marcus and UCLA! )

Somebody's bitter!

xLiQx wrote:Yeah, the polls are tricky. I am not saying I belonged in the top 10..but at 3 losses and winner of the Pac 12 beating all the ranked teams in the Pac 12 except Stanford...I can't believe the voters wouldn't put me ahead of UCLA...doesn't make sense, I think the massey had me theire, but both polls didn't, I was winner of like 8 straight too. Realistic voting would have me ahead of them after winning the pac 12 as well as they had 2 losses. It's not a big deal, cause I got the same bowl I would of got regardless and I will probably lose that bowl game haha.


and I dominated you Marcus and UCLA! )

I know I had you in my top 10 and pretty sure had you first in line behind the one loss teams. You had a pretty amazing run down the line.I also don't know how people didn't show more love for arkansas. In my opinion it was extremely close for Arkansas and VT for 2 and 3, I went with VT at 2 but could have went either way in my opinion. I'm not bitching and actually like the process, controversy makes it exciting and more realistic imo.

Its been said many times, but its worth repeating. Guys don't just vote based on W/L, SOS, etc etc etc

MrChampagne3 wrote:

xLiQx wrote:Yeah, the polls are tricky. I am not saying I belonged in the top 10..but at 3 losses and winner of the Pac 12 beating all the ranked teams in the Pac 12 except Stanford...I can't believe the voters wouldn't put me ahead of UCLA...doesn't make sense, I think the massey had me theire, but both polls didn't, I was winner of like 8 straight too. Realistic voting would have me ahead of them after winning the pac 12 as well as they had 2 losses. It's not a big deal, cause I got the same bowl I would of got regardless and I will probably lose that bowl game haha.


and I dominated you Marcus and UCLA! )

I know I had you in my top 10 and pretty sure had you first in line behind the one loss teams. You had a pretty amazing run down the line.I also don't know how people didn't show more love for arkansas. In my opinion it was extremely close for Arkansas and VT for 2 and 3, I went with VT at 2 but could have went either way in my opinion. I'm not bitching and actually like the process, controversy makes it exciting and more realistic imo.

Figure I would finally chime in here. How in the hell does Arkansas jump me? I loss one game ( #1 Va Tech at the time ) and hadn't lost a game since then and won the conference but you say you don't know why people didn't show more love to Arkansas? It's comments like these that confuse me on peoples voting processes. But like its stated all over the boards people will vote how they want to. I just don't understand it because logically none of it makes sense. I vote on W/L, when the loss takes place and to whom (i.e. ranked opp, what rank, margin, opp who isn't ranked, etc.) S.O.S. I had a lot of respect for the 1 loss teams this season as their were a lot of them. But I always wondered how a top 10 team loses to the #1 team and drop 8 spots and not lose another game and struggle to get back into the top 10 with teams above losing later in the season and still being voted higher. Then the #1 team losing to a team that's not ranked and only falling 2 spots. Again this is not a complaint, just me finally trying to say I don't understand the logic behind voting. Are people voting the team or based on whether or not they like the coach because sometimes it just seems that way and if that's the case that's really not a fair way to vote imo. But I said my piece, was just curious since we have all this voting talk going on lol.

Dcane7 wrote:

MrChampagne3 wrote:

xLiQx wrote:Yeah, the polls are tricky. I am not saying I belonged in the top 10..but at 3 losses and winner of the Pac 12 beating all the ranked teams in the Pac 12 except Stanford...I can't believe the voters wouldn't put me ahead of UCLA...doesn't make sense, I think the massey had me theire, but both polls didn't, I was winner of like 8 straight too. Realistic voting would have me ahead of them after winning the pac 12 as well as they had 2 losses. It's not a big deal, cause I got the same bowl I would of got regardless and I will probably lose that bowl game haha.


and I dominated you Marcus and UCLA! )

I know I had you in my top 10 and pretty sure had you first in line behind the one loss teams. You had a pretty amazing run down the line.I also don't know how people didn't show more love for arkansas. In my opinion it was extremely close for Arkansas and VT for 2 and 3, I went with VT at 2 but could have went either way in my opinion. I'm not bitching and actually like the process, controversy makes it exciting and more realistic imo.

Figure I would finally chime in here. How in the hell does Arkansas jump me? I loss one game ( #1 Va Tech at the time ) and hadn't lost a game since then and won the conference but you say you don't know why people didn't show more love to Arkansas? It's comments like these that confuse me on peoples voting processes. But like its stated all over the boards people will vote how they want to. I just don't understand it because logically none of it makes sense. I vote on W/L, when the loss takes place and to whom (i.e. ranked opp, what rank, margin, opp who isn't ranked, etc.) S.O.S. I had a lot of respect for the 1 loss teams this season as their were a lot of them. But I always wondered how a top 10 team loses to the #1 team and drop 8 spots and not lose another game and struggle to get back into the top 10 with teams above losing later in the season and still being voted higher. Then the #1 team losing to a team that's not ranked and only falling 2 spots. Again this is not a complaint, just me finally trying to say I don't understand the logic behind voting. Are people voting the team or based on whether or not they like the coach because sometimes it just seems that way and if that's the case that's really not a fair way to vote imo. But I said my piece, was just curious since we have all this voting talk going on lol.

Here would be my logic. You both lost to the the #1 team, though Bama is still undefeated. The SEC isn't as down as the B1G this year. Arkansas gets the nod. Though I couldn't let either of you jump VT. I gave VT the nod because of his streak and I want to see that matchup play out.

WooPigSooie316 wrote:

Dcane7 wrote:

MrChampagne3 wrote:

xLiQx wrote:Yeah, the polls are tricky. I am not saying I belonged in the top 10..but at 3 losses and winner of the Pac 12 beating all the ranked teams in the Pac 12 except Stanford...I can't believe the voters wouldn't put me ahead of UCLA...doesn't make sense, I think the massey had me theire, but both polls didn't, I was winner of like 8 straight too. Realistic voting would have me ahead of them after winning the pac 12 as well as they had 2 losses. It's not a big deal, cause I got the same bowl I would of got regardless and I will probably lose that bowl game haha.


and I dominated you Marcus and UCLA! )

I know I had you in my top 10 and pretty sure had you first in line behind the one loss teams. You had a pretty amazing run down the line.I also don't know how people didn't show more love for arkansas. In my opinion it was extremely close for Arkansas and VT for 2 and 3, I went with VT at 2 but could have went either way in my opinion. I'm not bitching and actually like the process, controversy makes it exciting and more realistic imo.

Figure I would finally chime in here. How in the hell does Arkansas jump me? I loss one game ( #1 Va Tech at the time ) and hadn't lost a game since then and won the conference but you say you don't know why people didn't show more love to Arkansas? It's comments like these that confuse me on peoples voting processes. But like its stated all over the boards people will vote how they want to. I just don't understand it because logically none of it makes sense. I vote on W/L, when the loss takes place and to whom (i.e. ranked opp, what rank, margin, opp who isn't ranked, etc.) S.O.S. I had a lot of respect for the 1 loss teams this season as their were a lot of them. But I always wondered how a top 10 team loses to the #1 team and drop 8 spots and not lose another game and struggle to get back into the top 10 with teams above losing later in the season and still being voted higher. Then the #1 team losing to a team that's not ranked and only falling 2 spots. Again this is not a complaint, just me finally trying to say I don't understand the logic behind voting. Are people voting the team or based on whether or not they like the coach because sometimes it just seems that way and if that's the case that's really not a fair way to vote imo. But I said my piece, was just curious since we have all this voting talk going on lol.

Here would be my logic. You both lost to the the #1 team, though Bama is still undefeated. The SEC isn't as down as the B1G this year. Arkansas gets the nod. Though I couldn't let either of you jump VT. I gave VT the nod because of his streak and I want to see that matchup play out.

See that's cool. I understand your logic. Doesn't make sense to me lol, but I understand it . But you have a honest and valid point.

I had Wisky 3rd I would like to see how everyone voted

No matter if you had ark 3 or 4 or wisky 3 or 4 it still doesn't matter in the grand scheme. Bowl games wouldn't have changed so no need to fret. Both losses were equal and close to same time ( cane lost block 1 and he lost block 2). Cane won big 10 which is great but big 10 was not the SEC this season. To me, it's a wash and both are deserving but again, wisky was going to rose and ark to sugar regardless.

BFiVL wrote:No matter if you had ark 3 or 4 or wisky 3 or 4 it still doesn't matter in the grand scheme. Bowl games wouldn't have changed so no need to fret. Both losses were equal and close to same time ( cane lost block 1 and he lost block 2). Cane won big 10 which is great but big 10 was not the SEC this season. To me, it's a wash and both are deserving but again, wisky was going to rose and ark to sugar regardless.

Agreed. It's close.

If Cane thinks Wisky should have been ahead of Arkansas, no biggie. But the notion that it "makes no sense" is pretty odd as it's really close.

I think he believes the ultimate factor and trump is that he won a major conf and Ark didn't. Both beat two teams ranked in final polls ( cane beat wease twice for his while ark beat unc and south car). They are very close regardless of the conf championship. Ark had a great year but got blocked by a better team that happened to be in same division. Shouldn't automatically penalize him for that IMO. One more year and we get a playoff and the 5/6 teams can debate.

I must be missing something here.... DCane is upset that Arkansas jumped him in the polls? BCS has Wisky at #3 and Arkansas #4. Polls have Wisky at #4/3 and Arkansas at #6/7. What am I missing here?

Dcane7 wrote:

WooPigSooie316 wrote:

Dcane7 wrote:

MrChampagne3 wrote:

xLiQx wrote:Yeah, the polls are tricky. I am not saying I belonged in the top 10..but at 3 losses and winner of the Pac 12 beating all the ranked teams in the Pac 12 except Stanford...I can't believe the voters wouldn't put me ahead of UCLA...doesn't make sense, I think the massey had me theire, but both polls didn't, I was winner of like 8 straight too. Realistic voting would have me ahead of them after winning the pac 12 as well as they had 2 losses. It's not a big deal, cause I got the same bowl I would of got regardless and I will probably lose that bowl game haha.


and I dominated you Marcus and UCLA! )

I know I had you in my top 10 and pretty sure had you first in line behind the one loss teams. You had a pretty amazing run down the line.I also don't know how people didn't show more love for arkansas. In my opinion it was extremely close for Arkansas and VT for 2 and 3, I went with VT at 2 but could have went either way in my opinion. I'm not bitching and actually like the process, controversy makes it exciting and more realistic imo.

Figure I would finally chime in here. How in the hell does Arkansas jump me? I loss one game ( #1 Va Tech at the time ) and hadn't lost a game since then and won the conference but you say you don't know why people didn't show more love to Arkansas? It's comments like these that confuse me on peoples voting processes. But like its stated all over the boards people will vote how they want to. I just don't understand it because logically none of it makes sense. I vote on W/L, when the loss takes place and to whom (i.e. ranked opp, what rank, margin, opp who isn't ranked, etc.) S.O.S. I had a lot of respect for the 1 loss teams this season as their were a lot of them. But I always wondered how a top 10 team loses to the #1 team and drop 8 spots and not lose another game and struggle to get back into the top 10 with teams above losing later in the season and still being voted higher. Then the #1 team losing to a team that's not ranked and only falling 2 spots. Again this is not a complaint, just me finally trying to say I don't understand the logic behind voting. Are people voting the team or based on whether or not they like the coach because sometimes it just seems that way and if that's the case that's really not a fair way to vote imo. But I said my piece, was just curious since we have all this voting talk going on lol.

Here would be my logic. You both lost to the the #1 team, though Bama is still undefeated. The SEC isn't as down as the B1G this year. Arkansas gets the nod. Though I couldn't let either of you jump VT. I gave VT the nod because of his streak and I want to see that matchup play out.

See that's cool. I understand your logic. Doesn't make sense to me lol, but I understand it . But you have a honest and valid point.

whats there not to get? lol. you play in the big 10... Lose 1 game in the SEC all year then make the case lol. Big Ten is like a mid major these days.

besides who gives a shit who finishes 3, 4, 5, 11th, 23rd, 124th, only 1 and 2 matter. When you start complaining about other spots then youre showing that winning means more than the community.

Color me confused.... But did Wisconsin not finish higher than me in ALL the polls? BCS, Coaches, and Media?
I guess I just don't understand the argument...

Not that it matters, because our Bowl destinations would have remained the same... But I had you at 4, and me at 5 Cane.