NDL Forum

Knappy83 wrote:It was a great season for ya, jsence2. You accomplished alot with that mid-major squad. Maybe you'll be able to upgrade come draft time. Just think of the offense you could put up with a real stud team, like maybe.....LSU!

There's only one team that I want, and this will hopefully be the last draft I'm ever in.

And LSU's QB isn't very good compared to the stud I had this season, I'd consider that a downgrade

ajalves wrote:

Knappy83 wrote:It was a great season for ya, jsence2. You accomplished alot with that mid-major squad. Maybe you'll be able to upgrade come draft time. Just think of the offense you could put up with a real stud team, like maybe.....LSU!

this feels like a shot at me......

actually I think its a shot at LSU

jsence2 wrote:There's only one team that I want, and this will hopefully be the last draft I'm ever in.

let's not pretend you haven't had the chance to get UK before and dynasty them

ill be moving into a tie for the 10th longest dynasty. that will be about as high as ill get, the top 7 aren't going anywhere.

VeniVediV1ci wrote:

jsence2 wrote:There's only one team that I want, and this will hopefully be the last draft I'm ever in.

let's not pretend you haven't had the chance to get UK before and dynasty them

....um, I haven't. I've never had enough draft points to pick in the top 15, when they were even available. They are an sec team, they go fast.

Again, PLEAAAAAAAASE get off my sack, its hard walking around w you on my jock!

jsence2 wrote:

VeniVediV1ci wrote:let's not pretend you haven't had the chance to get UK before and dynasty them

....um, I haven't. I've never had enough draft points to pick in the top 15, when they were even available. They are an sec team, they go fast.

Again, PLEAAAAAAAASE get off my sack, its hard walking around w you on my jock!

Oh really?

Season 18 after a 9-3 season at Washington you decided to keep your team instead of going to the draft where Kentucky didn't get selected until #23 with 33 teams kept so all you had to do was be in the top 56 picks to get them.

Season 19 after an 8-4 season at Washington you decided to keep your team instead of going to the draft where Kentucky didn't get selected until #24 with 34 teams kept so all you had to do was be in the top 58 picks to get them.

Season 20 after a 9-3 season at Washington you decided to keep your team instead of going to the draft where Kentucky didn't get selected until #44 with 30 teams kept so all you had to do was be in the top 74 picks to get them.

Season 21 after a 7-6 season at Washington you decided to keep your team instead of going to the draft where Kentucky didn't get selected until #32 with 33 teams kept so all you had to do was be in the top 65 picks to get them.

Boom.

VeniVediV1ci wrote:

jsence2 wrote:

VeniVediV1ci wrote:let's not pretend you haven't had the chance to get UK before and dynasty them

....um, I haven't. I've never had enough draft points to pick in the top 15, when they were even available. They are an sec team, they go fast.

Again, PLEAAAAAAAASE get off my sack, its hard walking around w you on my jock!

Oh really?

Season 18 after a 9-3 season at Washington you decided to keep your team instead of going to the draft where Kentucky didn't get selected until #23 with 33 teams kept so all you had to do was be in the top 56 picks to get them.

Season 19 after an 8-4 season at Washington you decided to keep your team instead of going to the draft where Kentucky didn't get selected until #24 with 34 teams kept so all you had to do was be in the top 58 picks to get them.

Season 20 after a 9-3 season at Washington you decided to keep your team instead of going to the draft where Kentucky didn't get selected until #44 with 30 teams kept so all you had to do was be in the top 74 picks to get them.

Season 21 after a 7-6 season at Washington you decided to keep your team instead of going to the draft where Kentucky didn't get selected until #32 with 33 teams kept so all you had to do was be in the top 65 picks to get them.

Boom.

And in all of those seasons I missed points for polls, and many times missed my win goal, which knocked me down to being mid 80s in points and barely keeping my team--which made me believe I would be one of the last people to draft on Day 1; thus, I decided to stick it out w Washington and hope that the next season I would do better and draft higher. Last I checked, we don't know who will enter, who won't, etc until after we have to decide. I took the safe route, stuck with a team I thought I could do well enough with NEXT season and get over 90, 95 points and draft high.

So please, again, stop worrying so much about me all the time, stop assuming you know everything when you clearly don't, and go "boom" yourself, you pretentious prick.

Btw....what is the opposite of love?

I'll answer for you--it's absolutely nothing. And the fact that you're so concerned about me shows how much you love me. It's kinda creepy.

Now go talk to yourself, I've washed my hands of you for good.

ajalves wrote:

Knappy83 wrote:It was a great season for ya, jsence2. You accomplished alot with that mid-major squad. Maybe you'll be able to upgrade come draft time. Just think of the offense you could put up with a real stud team, like maybe.....LSU!

this feels like a shot at me......

the depths of what you dont know yet

Mtwasik wrote:You guys have to remember, sometimes the reason some teams get higher is because they play their games on time, while others (though either their fault, or their opponents not being around to play, or so on), might end up playing half their games in the final two weeks. So, someone that's 8-2 with three weeks to go is going to be ranked higher then someone that might be 5-1, and then wins six in the last 2-3 weeks. Sometimes we have a coach not play at all for the first month or only one game, so he falls out with a 1-0 record, and then wins alot in the second half. That's why added the teams to look at in the voting aid, but sometimes that's just the way things happen.

Hey, am I the only guy in the league that decided to not consider the most recent poll (before this last one) and just look specifically at each team's final product? I didn't want to punish those that couldn't get their games in, in a timely manner. I pretty much treated it like it was the first (and only) top 25 poll being done, without taking into effect who was supposedly #4 or unranked or whatever, coming into this final poll. Just thought it would be the most fair way to do it, especially seeing I didn't join the league until week 10. Hope I don't get chewed on, for that.

Knappy83 wrote:

Mtwasik wrote:You guys have to remember, sometimes the reason some teams get higher is because they play their games on time, while others (though either their fault, or their opponents not being around to play, or so on), might end up playing half their games in the final two weeks. So, someone that's 8-2 with three weeks to go is going to be ranked higher then someone that might be 5-1, and then wins six in the last 2-3 weeks. Sometimes we have a coach not play at all for the first month or only one game, so he falls out with a 1-0 record, and then wins alot in the second half. That's why added the teams to look at in the voting aid, but sometimes that's just the way things happen.

Hey, am I the only guy in the league that decided to not consider the most recent poll (before this last one) and just look specifically at each team's final product? I didn't want to punish those that couldn't get their games in, in a timely manner. I pretty much treated it like it was the first (and only) top 25 poll being done, without taking into effect who was supposedly #4 or unranked or whatever, coming into this final poll. Just thought it would be the most fair way to do it, especially seeing I didn't join the league until week 10. Hope I don't get chewed on, for that.

thats what ive done for every final poll ever, only fair way to do it honestly

I did mine the same way. Easiest way for me to remove any bias to make as objective a vote as possible. Not all, but some lol.

cdub21 wrote:

Knappy83 wrote:

Mtwasik wrote:You guys have to remember, sometimes the reason some teams get higher is because they play their games on time, while others (though either their fault, or their opponents not being around to play, or so on), might end up playing half their games in the final two weeks. So, someone that's 8-2 with three weeks to go is going to be ranked higher then someone that might be 5-1, and then wins six in the last 2-3 weeks. Sometimes we have a coach not play at all for the first month or only one game, so he falls out with a 1-0 record, and then wins alot in the second half. That's why added the teams to look at in the voting aid, but sometimes that's just the way things happen.

Hey, am I the only guy in the league that decided to not consider the most recent poll (before this last one) and just look specifically at each team's final product? I didn't want to punish those that couldn't get their games in, in a timely manner. I pretty much treated it like it was the first (and only) top 25 poll being done, without taking into effect who was supposedly #4 or unranked or whatever, coming into this final poll. Just thought it would be the most fair way to do it, especially seeing I didn't join the league until week 10. Hope I don't get chewed on, for that.

thats what ive done for every final poll ever, only fair way to do it honestly

Same here.

That's the way it should always be done--in here or in real life.

I hate that in the real-life polls, if someone loses, they slide automatically and the teams behind them just conveyer belt up. That's why I loved seeing UNC move up in the polls this week after losing to UK--nobody who watch that game can say they aren't one of the 4 best teams in the nation, and thus they moved from #5 to #4 despite losing.

jsence2 wrote:just conveyer belt up.

Guilty.

I like to think I offset it by doing a good job in setting up the earlier polls, but I am guilty nonetheless.

Where do we see the BCS poll? Curious how close Mizzou and Pitt were and where Nevada fell in there.

GeorgesGoons wrote:Where do we see the BCS poll? Curious how close Mizzou and Pitt were and where Nevada fell in there.

+1

Whats wrong with Nevada giving himself a number one vote if thats how he feels? He lost one game just like everyone else I would have done the same.

I went 12-0 w UTEP one season and voted myself number one as well as at Virginia I went 13-0 and voted myself number one. Why wouldn't you do that in real life as well?

packsyD22 wrote:Whats wrong with Nevada giving himself a number one vote if thats how he feels? He lost one game just like everyone else I would have done the same.

I went 12-0 w UTEP one season and voted myself number one as well as at Virginia I went 13-0 and voted myself number one. Why wouldn't you do that in real life as well?

There's a difference between unbeaten, and one-loss when teams with one loss played a much tougher schedule than you did.