shel311 wrote:Another idea, yea.GeorgesGoons wrote:Just don't allow them to receive Revenue Sharing.shel311 wrote:Not entirely.wdoupis wrote:Someone already stated this but its impossible to have a salary floor without not allowing teams to go over budget as when you are in debt that is the end of that. Can't really force guys to trade for bad contracts to hit a salary floor.
I do not like the idea of allowing guys to not go over budget as if you do it strategically its a really good way to increase your talent level/budget without going in to debt.
If you set a floor of $50mil, and a team has a $30mil payroll, you can just take $20mil cash from them at the end of the season. This could force teams that can afford it to at least have a team with a pulse out there, and for teams who are so far in the negative, it could be a deterrent to not go so far into the negative before a rebuild.
But you'd still prefer a $15mil tanking payroll with no rev sharing as opposed to $50mil. But if you have $15mil and we take $35mil cash, you'll be much more inclined to spend it.
I was saying if you have a minimum team salary and if you don't reach it you don't get revenue sharing. You don't take cash from them