Page 1 of 1
Fumbles
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:47 pm
by GeorgesGoons
Has anyone noticed that there were an abundance of fumbles this year? I'm thinking its because a mix of Aggressive Big Hit and Aggressive Break Tackles. But to see 6 of the top 20 RB's with 5 fumbles or more and 13 RB's in the top 100 have over 5 fumbles, and 18 guys total have over 5 fumbles lost is alot. Do we keep stats on this over the years to see how this trends out?
Re: Fumbles
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:03 pm
by Weasel
Ive fumbled on a kick return in the last 4 games Ive played. In one of the games, I went 23-25 passing without an INT and lost bc of three fumbles, ugh
Re: Fumbles
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:08 pm
by DRWebs
Rarely see any...must be either the teams or your settings
Re: Fumbles
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:35 pm
by packsyD22
Mikell Simpson was a fumbling machine. Hes not the biggest back and I ran him between the tackles a bunch late in the season and it would get him hurt or have him fumble....good thing I got half of them back or else his numbers would be through the roof.
Re: Fumbles
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:44 pm
by ReignOnU
High fumbles on the KOs are definitely a result of the Aggressive Run.
As for my my fumbles, I run A LOT of option... and the magic behind the back, 3 yard away INTs/Fumbles are normally the cause. If that's not it, then it's the incredible 3 sec delay.
Re: Fumbles
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:19 pm
by Ank
I lost 2 fumbles this season...A WR fumbled against GT (imcomplete pass I think) and a fumble against Vandy.
Re: Fumbles
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:39 pm
by Uuaww
I had 6 fumbles between my two backs and 387 carries, I think that is about right.
Re: Fumbles
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:41 pm
by VeniVediV1ci
C.J. Spiller is a 95 and i was worried everytime he got hit that he would fumble
Re: Fumbles
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:27 am
by Weasel
ReignOnU wrote:High fumbles on the KOs are definitely a result of the Aggressive Run.
Which would make sense if I actually used that feature
Re: Fumbles
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:43 am
by ReignOnU
It's probably in the 33% chance range with it on. The only other factor that I've seen to increase it is using CBs instead of WRs/RBs. Otherwise, I've logged well over 200 games and I don't see any reason why you would see something else.