NFL Thread

[nick]

Garcon is a #4 WR that is being put into a #2 spot.

Or a slot receiver (an SL or Y) for the football experts....

But if they're in a 46 defense and he's still got a CB lined up on him what do you audible to?

Argument lost. Point me.

how the fuck is a CB gonna be lined up on a slot receiver in a 4-6 when they're obviously running 3 minimum. Stupid Seeit go be a lacrosse goalie and leave football to us juco coordinators

[nick]

anyone else notice Seeit's jokes always come up a lil short?

[DRiccio21]

Garcon is a #4 WR that is being put into a #2 spot.

Or a slot receiver (an SL or Y) for the football experts....

L.O.L.

[LetsGoPeay]

anyone else notice Seeit's jokes always come up a lil short?

Why you gotta bring deedub into this?

[nick]

anyone else notice Seeit's jokes always come up a lil short?

Why you gotta bring deedub into this?

Shit I thought we were talking about VVV

[Seeitsaveit13]

Garcon is a #4 WR that is being put into a #2 spot.

Or a slot receiver (an SL or Y) for the football experts....

But if they're in a 46 defense and he's still got a CB lined up on him what do you audible to?

Argument lost. Point me.

how the fuck is a CB gonna be lined up on a slot receiver in a 4-6 when they're obviously running 3 minimum. Stupid Seeit go be a lacrosse goalie and leave football to us juco coordinators

No shit sherlock. It was a joke.

The short joke was B- though, I'll give you props

[shel311]

Garcon is a #4 WR that is being put into a #2 spot.

Or a slot receiver (an SL or Y) for the football experts....

ZING!


Easily an A

[Uuaww]

Garcon is a #4 WR that is being put into a #2 spot.

Or a slot receiver (an SL or Y) for the football experts....

I honestly thought you were talking about a ps3 or xbox controller when you said that.

[nick]

Garcon is a #4 WR that is being put into a #2 spot.

Or a slot receiver (an SL or Y) for the football experts....

I honestly thought you were talking about a ps3 or xbox controller when you said that.

and that's why you live on an island I didn't even know existed til last year

[walker213]

Sure Garcon is fast and runs good routes... when he's running the correct route. I've watched every minute of every Colts game since... forever. I can't count the number of times where I've seen Manning bitch at Garcon because he wasn't where he was supposed to be. I can think of at least three Manning INT's this year that were due to Garcon running the wrong route. Then there's all the dropped balls that went right through his hands. Right now Garcon is a huge example of a risk/reward player. Last year he was probably 80/20 in favor of reward. This year he's breaking even or even slightly negative.

I value your opinion. You have watched every game so you know exactly what's going on. I was just judging him based off when I watch him play. I never said he was Marvin Harrison, I just said he has all the intangibles to be a solid receiver in the NFL. I never knew he had stone hands though, I guess he just brings his A-game when I watch him! lol

The weird thing is that he doesn't seem to have stone hands. Its almost as if he has weak hands. A lot of balls will just go through his hands as if he can't handle a hard thrown ball. I really think that if Gonzalez, Collie, and Clark weren't hurt he would have been demoted by now due to his lack of focus and not valuing the ball at times.

Very interesting. Is he just inconsistent? Because every time I watch a Colts game I feel like Garcon is a beast. He looks a lot like Percy Harvin with the ball in his hands and can make some serious plays.

And do all of y'all seriously think he is a #4 receiver? Maybe I am missing something and need to watch more Colts games!

[packsyD22]

So last season i preached TOP being a critical stat in the NFL.....am I still wrong about that too?.......

[shel311]

So last season i preached TOP being a critical stat in the NFL.....am I still wrong about that too?.......

You played football, how could you possibly be wrong about that?

[nick]

So last season i preached TOP being a critical stat in the NFL.....am I still wrong about that too?.......

You played football, how could you possibly be wrong about that?

meh, making fun of Packsyd being a football coordinator was dead like 3 hours ago. Get with the times

[packsyD22]

Carson Rule shel........please teach me how to be right about everything someday.

[DRiccio21]

So last season i preached TOP being a critical stat in the NFL.....am I still wrong about that too?.......

i hate using a word like wrong. but i'd say you aren't correct.

TOP, thru thousands of games of analysis, has not proven to be a key metric when determining winning and losing.

[shel311]

So last season i preached TOP being a critical stat in the NFL.....am I still wrong about that too?.......

i hate using a word like wrong. but i'd say you aren't correct.

TOP, thru thousands of games of analysis, has not proven to be a key metric when determining winning and losing.

You and your stats.

[DRiccio21]

So last season i preached TOP being a critical stat in the NFL.....am I still wrong about that too?.......

i hate using a word like wrong. but i'd say you aren't correct.

TOP, thru thousands of games of analysis, has not proven to be a key metric when determining winning and losing.

You and your stats.

those are actually trendons stats. i should have cited him.

[Cnasty]

Who said the NFL isn't fun??

HOF this thread...

[packsyD22]

Prove it..........

Spoiler!

this is probably gonna get me murdered by everyone, but a bold question

.

[nick]

superbowl champs were 11th in TOP

New Orleans - 11th
Pitt - 6th
New York - 6th
Indianapolis - 23rd