Damn, even I remember that. Him and Schoola were tank bitchesHoos wrote:Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, like anybody is going to believe that. Biffy would be in that tank about 1.5 seconds after the match started.
E3 2011 Discussion
- Cnasty
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 65672
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: NDL:F Headquarters: Orlando
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
BF2 seems to have a good balance with vehicles...I like it that you need to communicate with your squad to be successful. 3 should be building on this.
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
you might want to check out the 6 minute MW3 trailer before you say that....autiger730 wrote:COD is going down.

- autiger730
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3615
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:52 pm
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
saw itajalves wrote:you might want to check out the 6 minute MW3 trailer before you say that....autiger730 wrote:COD is going down.
PSN & 360: AUTiger730
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
then you'd have to agree they look almost the sameautiger730 wrote:saw itajalves wrote:you might want to check out the 6 minute MW3 trailer before you say that....autiger730 wrote:COD is going down.

Re: E3 2011 Discussion
COD is far from getting owned. It will out sell BF3. The difference is that COD always does MP better than anybody else. You are in action almost immediately thanks the map designs.
Other devs have borrowed heavily from COD but nobody has improved on what they do for MP. BF3 looks great and hopefully will be great but until they can match what COD does for MP then they will always be behind.
Other devs have borrowed heavily from COD but nobody has improved on what they do for MP. BF3 looks great and hopefully will be great but until they can match what COD does for MP then they will always be behind.
- Cnasty
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 65672
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: NDL:F Headquarters: Orlando
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
It must be better because getting into a game "instantly" in cod was not it's strong suit and actually the most annoying part.
Tha was about 3 weeks though
Tha was about 3 weeks though

Re: E3 2011 Discussion
^ I meant once the game starts you find action right away.
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
Skyrim is moving up my list. I just wish every game didn't have to come out in Nov. 

Re: E3 2011 Discussion
Oblivion was a very good game so I can only imagine Skyrim being better.Hoos wrote:Skyrim is moving up my list. I just wish every game didn't have to come out in Nov.
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
Mass Effect 3 also looks amazing. The second one kept my attention the whole way through and with your actions from the previous game carrying over into the new game...awesomeness.
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
off the hizzy?Matt90210 wrote:Bioshock is gonna be off the charts
- autiger730
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3615
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:52 pm
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
Two words: destructible enviromentsajalves wrote:then you'd have to agree they look almost the sameautiger730 wrote:saw itajalves wrote:you might want to check out the 6 minute MW3 trailer before you say that....autiger730 wrote:COD is going down.
Campers have a hard time finding a spot when you can call in mortars, shoot a barrage of shells with a tank, or use C4 to drop their cover. And by cover I mean the entire building.
PSN & 360: AUTiger730
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
show me one online that doesnt cause a ton of lag, then i'll concedeautiger730 wrote: Two words: destructible enviroments
Campers have a hard time finding a spot when you can call in mortars, shoot a barrage of shells with a tank, or use C4 to drop their cover. And by cover I mean the entire building.

- autiger730
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3615
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:52 pm
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
I had less problems with lag on Bad Company 2 than on MW2 or BLOPS. Played that on XBL though.ajalves wrote:show me one online that doesnt cause a ton of lag, then i'll concedeautiger730 wrote: Two words: destructible enviroments
Campers have a hard time finding a spot when you can call in mortars, shoot a barrage of shells with a tank, or use C4 to drop their cover. And by cover I mean the entire building.
PSN & 360: AUTiger730
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
Same, hardly ever had a laggy room on BF2. I will be getting both most likely, but might only get one for PS3 and play my sons for Xbox.autiger730 wrote:I had less problems with lag on Bad Company 2 than on MW2 or BLOPS. Played that on XBL though.ajalves wrote:show me one online that doesnt cause a ton of lag, then i'll concedeautiger730 wrote: Two words: destructible enviroments
Campers have a hard time finding a spot when you can call in mortars, shoot a barrage of shells with a tank, or use C4 to drop their cover. And by cover I mean the entire building.


PSN: Cougnix
Re: E3 2011 Discussion
wasnt laggy because there were only 10,000 people playing
and to be honest, BLOPS lag is terrible. However, MW2 wasnt bad at all
and to be honest, BLOPS lag is terrible. However, MW2 wasnt bad at all

Re: E3 2011 Discussion
That is all I care about...ajalves wrote:wasnt laggy because there were only 10,000 people playing
and to be honest, BLOPS lag is terrible. However, MW2 wasnt bad at all
MW2 was just boring.
If MW3 has dedicated servers like the rumors are saying, then I think we will all be pleased.
PS: Played Socom 4 last night...Holy lord the game is horrible. Spawn camping is essentially all you see in the games, no matter what the objective and 90% of kills are head shots. Stupid ass Zipper...


PSN: Cougnix