2015-16 Offseason Transactions
- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72606
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Anybody notice any bogus rumors in the free agent offseason tracker, where it says you're rumored to be interested in one of the top 25 guys, but you haven't offered him anything?
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Yeah, I was supposedly interested in Pepin. I don't even think I clicked on his profile.shel311 wrote:Anybody notice any bogus rumors in the free agent offseason tracker, where it says you're rumored to be interested in one of the top 25 guys, but you haven't offered him anything?
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
You would draft the exact same way. With the OSA ratings (the same one the utility uses). This is a non-issue.shel311 wrote:So I can draft in peace.brwnbear wrote: Why would you penalize those of us who do?
IM: brwnbear26
- Seeitsaveit13
- Reactions:
- Posts: 15327
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:14 am
- Location: NDL:O at Heart
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
+2. If you don't want to use them, don't use them.brwnbear wrote:+1Bernie32 wrote:Please, please do not get rid of scouts. IF you do, everyone will have all the same info and points of view. It will get boring quick, at least for me it will. We are suppose to be simulating GM's. They have scouts and data. They take into account both and make a decision.
If you dont want to use scouts. Dont use them. Why would you penalize those of us who do?




- plasma1896
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5763
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:33 am
- Location: NDL-C California/West Coast Opertations
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Seeitsaveit13 wrote:+2. If you don't want to use them, don't use them.brwnbear wrote:+1Bernie32 wrote:Please, please do not get rid of scouts. IF you do, everyone will have all the same info and points of view. It will get boring quick, at least for me it will. We are suppose to be simulating GM's. They have scouts and data. They take into account both and make a decision.
If you dont want to use scouts. Dont use them. Why would you penalize those of us who do?
+3
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
ya!!! if u guys dont wanna use them dont use them. jeez
- brett11253
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:19 pm
- Location: Grove City, OH
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
+4plasma1896 wrote:Seeitsaveit13 wrote:+2. If you don't want to use them, don't use them.brwnbear wrote:+1Bernie32 wrote:Please, please do not get rid of scouts. IF you do, everyone will have all the same info and points of view. It will get boring quick, at least for me it will. We are suppose to be simulating GM's. They have scouts and data. They take into account both and make a decision.
If you dont want to use scouts. Dont use them. Why would you penalize those of us who do?
+3
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Well, no need to vote on that one since it won't enough to overturn things as I would have also voted to keep scouts on. I just don't pay one iota of attention to overall and potential rating. Not one. 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
So what are you going off of for your rotation ratings??? Just curious.trendon wrote: 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
They are my ratings. Not yours. Snoop.Baker wrote:So what are you going off of for your rotation ratings??? Just curious.trendon wrote: 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
trendon wrote:They are my ratings. Not yours. Snoop.Baker wrote:So what are you going off of for your rotation ratings??? Just curious.trendon wrote: 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
cool...glad you aren't my scout.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Albany's reign is over. MUHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHABaker wrote:trendon wrote:They are my ratings. Not yours. Snoop.Baker wrote:So what are you going off of for your rotation ratings??? Just curious.trendon wrote: 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
cool...glad you aren't my scout.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
New York has had no reign HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!trendon wrote:Albany's reign is over. MUHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHABaker wrote:trendon wrote:They are my ratings. Not yours. Snoop.Baker wrote:So what are you going off of for your rotation ratings??? Just curious.trendon wrote: 70% of the ratings comes from stats anyway.
cool...glad you aren't my scout.
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Inaugural champions and second to Albany in playoff wins, playa! That's a reign.Baker wrote: New York has had no reign HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
If your happy with 2nd...I'm happy for ya!
- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72606
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
*trendon wrote:Inaugural champions
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Asterisk, my ass. Jason Stillwell 4 LYFEshel311 wrote:*trendon wrote:Inaugural champions
- shel311
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 72606
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
- Location: Sheltown Shockers
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
I have it on good authority that that sim was run 17 times in order to get the desired result. Sheltown was THAT good!!!trendon wrote:Asterisk, my ass. Jason Stillwell 4 LYFEshel311 wrote:*trendon wrote:Inaugural champions
- Cnasty
- NDL Championships
- Reactions:
- Posts: 65672
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: NDL:F Headquarters: Orlando
Re: 2015-16 Offseason Transactions
Keyshel311 wrote:Sheltown was THAT good!!!
Word