You had me doubting myself!!!Wasted Memory wrote:Huh, that's pretty weird. Downloaded the file this morning and it came up and told me it had finished. Even had new mail. In game date on my screen was not right though. Had to close OOTP and reopen it then everything was fine.
This '19...when's '20 coming out?
I stand corrected now Corey!
Just a couple of rule 5 picks making me proudCnasty wrote:Stupid Richmond.
Miggy's quest for 40/40 was thwarted by being thrown out 4 times in the series against the Greeks.
Only if I also agreed to play down to mine...GeorgesGoons wrote:100% AGREE! I'd be leading the division if we could play up to our Pythag.Wasted Memory wrote:Now would be a good time for the -5 pythag to work itself out....
Jesus this. "Put me in now!" ......hits .145 and bitches when they are on the bench.....kdog36 wrote:I wish I could respond to these players that email me saying they deserve a shot at starting lineup that when I put them in there to show me instead of hitting .201
That's one bizarre way to compare divisions...nick wrote:if u go spot by spot (1v1, 2v2 etc)
AL East vs
AL Central: 4-1
AL West: 5-0
NL East: 4-1
NL Central: 4-1
NL West: 4-1
AL Beast it is.
Agreedakshdar wrote:That's one bizarre way to compare divisions...nick wrote:if u go spot by spot (1v1, 2v2 etc)
AL East vs
AL Central: 4-1
AL West: 5-0
NL East: 4-1
NL Central: 4-1
NL West: 4-1
AL Beast it is.
You dont wanna do that.GeorgesGoons wrote: Go with overall records of each division as a whole
I believe the AL East is 57 games over .500.Cnasty wrote:You dont wanna do that.GeorgesGoons wrote: Go with overall records of each division as a whole
Well I beat Boston so there is that win ha.nick wrote:if u go spot by spot (1v1, 2v2 etc)
AL East vs
AL Central: 4-1
AL West: 5-0
NL East: 4-1
NL Central: 4-1
NL West: 4-1
AL Beast it is.
without writing a book, how would you go about comparing then?dakshdar wrote:That's one bizarre way to compare divisions...nick wrote:if u go spot by spot (1v1, 2v2 etc)
AL East vs
AL Central: 4-1
AL West: 5-0
NL East: 4-1
NL Central: 4-1
NL West: 4-1
AL Beast it is.
It's just random that you're affirming that whatever the head-to-head of teams at the same position in different divisions is confirms whether one division is ahead of the other.nick wrote:without writing a book, how would you go about comparing then?dakshdar wrote:That's one bizarre way to compare divisions...nick wrote:if u go spot by spot (1v1, 2v2 etc)
AL East vs
AL Central: 4-1
AL West: 5-0
NL East: 4-1
NL Central: 4-1
NL West: 4-1
AL Beast it is.
We play teams in other divisions at a sample size equal to one playoff series - meaning it's somewhat meaningless.Uuaww wrote:Well I beat Boston so there is that win ha.nick wrote:if u go spot by spot (1v1, 2v2 etc)
AL East vs
AL Central: 4-1
AL West: 5-0
NL East: 4-1
NL Central: 4-1
NL West: 4-1
AL Beast it is.
well every division faces their own division the same amount and would equal to .500 since everyone has to win and lose the game.. so our like, +50 on every other division would lead me to believe that we dominate everyone.dakshdar wrote:It's just random that you're affirming that whatever the head-to-head of teams at the same position in different divisions is confirms whether one division is ahead of the other.nick wrote:without writing a book, how would you go about comparing then?dakshdar wrote:That's one bizarre way to compare divisions...nick wrote:if u go spot by spot (1v1, 2v2 etc)
AL East vs
AL Central: 4-1
AL West: 5-0
NL East: 4-1
NL Central: 4-1
NL West: 4-1
AL Beast it is.
The better comparison would likely be to show the actual record of one division against the other division, not just pairing off teams based on standings.
If you add up the records vs the other division, the picture is more complete. As a possible example - a 3rd place AL East team may be 4-2 against the 3rd place AL West team, but 5-19 against the other AL West teams. Vice versa, that 3rd place AL West team may be above 0.500 against the AL East overall, but just 2-4 against the 3rd place team.
The way you tabulate it that is a Win for the AL East, but it would be misleading. It also limits the sample size when you do it your way: fewer games = more chance for results that don't truly indicate overall relative ranking.
+50 what? The AL East has 20 more total wins than the AL Central... 30 more than the AL West. 7 more than the NL West.nick wrote:well every division faces their own division the same amount and would equal to .500 since everyone has to win and lose the game.. so our like, +50 on every other division would lead me to believe that we dominate everyone.dakshdar wrote:It's just random that you're affirming that whatever the head-to-head of teams at the same position in different divisions is confirms whether one division is ahead of the other.nick wrote:without writing a book, how would you go about comparing then?dakshdar wrote:That's one bizarre way to compare divisions...nick wrote:if u go spot by spot (1v1, 2v2 etc)
AL East vs
AL Central: 4-1
AL West: 5-0
NL East: 4-1
NL Central: 4-1
NL West: 4-1
AL Beast it is.
The better comparison would likely be to show the actual record of one division against the other division, not just pairing off teams based on standings.
If you add up the records vs the other division, the picture is more complete. As a possible example - a 3rd place AL East team may be 4-2 against the 3rd place AL West team, but 5-19 against the other AL West teams. Vice versa, that 3rd place AL West team may be above 0.500 against the AL East overall, but just 2-4 against the 3rd place team.
The way you tabulate it that is a Win for the AL East, but it would be misleading. It also limits the sample size when you do it your way: fewer games = more chance for results that don't truly indicate overall relative ranking.
