my team has no fullback

gambit725 · Post by **gambit725** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:08 pm

so they put a running back in place of the fullback, so am i a loud to pick a player book that has i formation or to backs in the back field, so if i could get a ruling on this so i can find a play book. thanks

sunspotiens · Post by **sunspotiens** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:33 pm

so they put a running back in place of the fullback, so am i allowed to pick a player book that has i formation or two backs in the back field, so if i could get a ruling on this so i can find a play book. thanks

I would be fine with...I use dual hb formation subs all the time, that would be almost the same as doing that.

kdog36 · Post by **kdog36** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:39 pm

TE would work also If you re-order I think it puts TE's in place of no FB's

but like usual i could be wrong.

so what the deal with the rosters????

VeniVediV1ci · Post by **VeniVediV1ci** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:58 pm

kdog36 wrote:TE would work also If you re-order I think it puts TE's in place of no FB's

but like usual i could be wrong.

so what the deal with the rosters????

basically EA hired a new roster guy who sucks more dick than Richard Simmons

Dolemitesooner · Post by **Dolemitesooner** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:20 pm

RICHARD SIMMONS SUCKS DICK!!!!!!!??????????????

VTrunNgun · Post by **VTrunNgun** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:05 pm

Guess this would be a good time to note that my team has no Tight Ends, although none of the formations in my playbook call for TE play.

Post by **shel311** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:07 pm

VTrunNgun wrote:my team has no Tight Ends

Sounds like Dole's team.

mcx79 · Post by **mcx79** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:50 pm

VeniVediV1ci wrote:
kdog36 wrote:TE would work also If you re-order I think it puts TE's in place of no FB's

but like usual i could be wrong.

so what the deal with the rosters????
basically EA hired a new roster guy who sucks more dick than Richard Simmons

he sucks dick to the oldies!

sammy33 · Post by **sammy33** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:51 pm

shel311 wrote:
VTrunNgun wrote:my team has no Tight Ends
Sounds like Dole's team.

Damn

. By far the funniest thing I've heard at work today.

ICE · Post by **ICE** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:25 pm

Southern Miss last season (and I think this season) doesn't have a FB. I just inserted my #2 TE in that spot and maybe handed to him 3 times all season. There are several teams that don't have an FB.

gambit725 · Post by **gambit725** » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:17 am

but can i just leave it the way they have and pick a play book with twin backs or i formation. i dont want to make anyone mad with having two running backs in the back field at the same time.

Post by **ajalves** » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:53 am

ICE wrote:Southern Miss last season (and I think this season) doesn't have a FB. I just inserted my #2 TE in that spot and maybe handed to him 3 times all season. There are several teams that don't have an FB.

this is the way to go

NDL Forum

my team has no fullback

my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback

Re: my team has no fullback