Crowes wrote:Heisman. AA would make stats out of this world. 3000 yard backs and ungodly yardages for passers.
And how is that any different than playing on heisman where some guys throw 5 TDs passes and 42 INTs for the season???
Crowes wrote:Heisman. AA would make stats out of this world. 3000 yard backs and ungodly yardages for passers.
Yes, but that exaggeration you just said goes directly on that users skills.shel311 wrote:And how is that any different than playing on heisman where some guys throw 5 TDs passes and 42 INTs for the season???
Cnasty wrote:Yes, but that exaggeration you just said goes directly on that users skills.shel311 wrote:And how is that any different than playing on heisman where some guys throw 5 TDs passes and 42 INTs for the season???![]()
You really think if we go AA there still wont be a ton of guys with more interceptions than TDs?
I think it will be about the same and if there is a difference, very marginally. Like 3 to 5 guys even.
I agree...I know this is the NDL, but what makes the NDL great is the guys who play to have fun. And throwing 42 INTs a season is not fun. I mean, there's no question there are different levels of players in this league, but I'd love to see those players have more access to an offensive game. I think if we keep playing Heisman just because, and the defensive numbers stay ridiculous, it'll be to the detriment of the future of the league. Guys will begin dropping out of frustration because they can't have any fun on offense, and the only guys who do have fun on offense are the ones with the best teams who spend the most time practicing. And if we do that, I just kinda feel like we change the focus of the league from fun to total competition.shel311 wrote:Crowes wrote:Heisman. AA would make stats out of this world. 3000 yard backs and ungodly yardages for passers.
And how is that any different than playing on heisman where some guys throw 5 TDs passes and 42 INTs for the season???
I dunno, Im not great by any stretch at this game but offense is of plenty on heisman as far as I can tell on games I've played.shel311 wrote:Cnasty wrote:Yes, but that exaggeration you just said goes directly on that users skills.shel311 wrote:And how is that any different than playing on heisman where some guys throw 5 TDs passes and 42 INTs for the season???![]()
You really think if we go AA there still wont be a ton of guys with more interceptions than TDs?
I think it will be about the same and if there is a difference, very marginally. Like 3 to 5 guys even.
I think there will be somewhat of a difference.
But the main point is our game will FINALLY be more of an offensive oriented game and less of an INT fest 4 out of every 5 games. And this is college football, a very offensive oriented game, so that seems more realistic.
And how much skill would it really take to rush for 2000-2500 yards with Jahvid Best???![]()
So, it works both ways, let's try to have some offense for once, lol.
I think this might be ok...chances are all these games with high scores talked about were evenly matched teams right? Well, what's the matter with Texas and Oklahoma playing to a 45-35 finish? I think it's easier to also assume this will happen when we're all playing scrims. I think a lot more scores will be tamer because of a little more caution in league games.Cnasty wrote:Exaggeration yes.
BUT combined total score, I would tend to agree. Im all for wide open and fun ability for EVERYONE, but 70-80 seems like a pretty fair assesment of total scores for both teams.
I think every AA game I had so far was in that range if not 60-70 range.
Again, not bashing either level but I personally love Heisman and AA would just be who gets the ball last wins. Then again, Im not a good representation because my D is HORRID.
Hoos wrote:I've noticed that one of Shel's bully tactics is to throw in a lot of these ?????????????
See I guess we've just played different games so far cause I havent seen the turnovers that you have. In my last game with biffy I fumbled the ball on like 5 str8 possessions but that wasnt because of a ridiculous defense It was me doin the same thing over and over with trying to juke in crowd of defenders.dak wrote:
I've only played a couple games, but I've seen some RIDICULOUS INTs on Heisman. Like, my receiver drops it, and a defender is laying on the ground and catches it. More than once. Just my thoughts. AA all the way. If it's a mistake then let's switch next season, but I think a lot more people would have fun.
This is true and I agree with that...if we are on Heisman.Doodee wrote:I think a lot more scores will be tamer because of a little more caution in league games.
Doodee wrote:I agree...I know this is the NDL, but what makes the NDL great is the guys who play to have fun. And throwing 42 INTs a season is not fun. I mean, there's no question there are different levels of players in this league, but I'd love to see those players have more access to an offensive game. I think if we keep playing Heisman just because, and the defensive numbers stay ridiculous, it'll be to the detriment of the future of the league. Guys will begin dropping out of frustration because they can't have any fun on offense, and the only guys who do have fun on offense are the ones with the best teams who spend the most time practicing. And if we do that, I just kinda feel like we change the focus of the league from fun to total competition.shel311 wrote:Crowes wrote:Heisman. AA would make stats out of this world. 3000 yard backs and ungodly yardages for passers.
And how is that any different than playing on heisman where some guys throw 5 TDs passes and 42 INTs for the season???
I've only played a couple games, but I've seen some RIDICULOUS INTs on Heisman. Like, my receiver drops it, and a defender is laying on the ground and catches it. More than once. Just my thoughts. AA all the way. If it's a mistake then let's switch next season, but I think a lot more people would have fun.
Crowes wrote:I dunno, Im not great by any stretch at this game but offense is of plenty on heisman as far as I can tell on games I've played.
So, you're saying they played kinda high scoring like real life college football games?Cnasty wrote:I think every AA game I had so far was in that range if not 60-70 range.