Page 2 of 2
Re: Eliminate Revenue Sharing
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:06 am
by shel311
ReignOnU wrote:If the demands aren't realistic, then why not adjust the target FA values?
Right, why would we eliminate revenue sharing, which has nothing to with our actual issue?
Wasted's band-aid post nailed it.
Re: Eliminate Revenue Sharing
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:39 am
by Cnasty
ReignOnU wrote:If the demands aren't realistic, then why not adjust the target FA values?
I've mentioned that in another thread just like when we adjusted the coaches/managers demands in the past.
Re: Eliminate Revenue Sharing
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:44 am
by wdoupis
The demands have not changed. I am not near game but a superstar player is set at 18 and it trickles down from there
Re: Eliminate Revenue Sharing
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:51 am
by Wasted Memory
wdoupis wrote:The demands have not changed.
Are you saying that with a straight face? Seriously?
Re: Eliminate Revenue Sharing
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:52 am
by shel311
Wasted Memory wrote:wdoupis wrote:The demands have not changed.
Are you saying that with a straight face? Seriously?
He means the designated amount set behind the scenes.
Re: Eliminate Revenue Sharing
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 11:33 am
by Wasted Memory
shel311 wrote:Wasted Memory wrote:wdoupis wrote:The demands have not changed.
Are you saying that with a straight face? Seriously?
He means the designated amount set behind the scenes.
Ah, gotcha.
Re: Eliminate Revenue Sharing
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2018 2:05 pm
by ajalves
one issue is media revenue is still like 40 mill per team (or it was when I left) .....what do the modern day 'real life' teams make? 100-200 mill per for the bigger markets? total guess.
media revenue has been the same for as long as I can remember...
if everything is scaling upward, then so should media $$