Realignment Poll

Post Winter Meeting topics here

Moderators: Cnasty, Ry, nick, ReignOnU, Bernie32

Do you want realignment

Yes
15
54%
No
13
46%
 
Total votes: 28

nick
Reactions:
Posts: 44851
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:40 pm

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by nick »

the NBA doesnt have 1 division.. they have 3 :s
The_Niddler
Reactions:
Posts: 17241
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:57 pm
Location: Small Town, Ohio

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by The_Niddler »

I mean when it comes time for playoffs.
They might as well have 1 division since the top eight teams in each conference (East and West), ranked in order by win-loss records, qualify for the playoffs.
What is the point of the 3 divisions if they really mean nothing?
PSN: The_Niddler
TWITCH: The_Niddler
User avatar
GeorgesGoons
Reactions:
Posts: 23176
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
Location: Omaha
Contact:

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by GeorgesGoons »

Seeitsaveit13 wrote:
qazhby wrote:realignment is lame, also since when did we start doing majority wins for Winter Meetings?
Depends on who is winning and which people support the vote that's occurring, generally, from what I've seen.
Correct
ImageImageImage
wdoupis
Reactions:
Posts: 14551
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:21 pm
Location: Richmond Greeks

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by wdoupis »

I don’t think it has anything to do with who is winning. I am in one of the easiest divisions and voted yes. Corey and Ted support it. I don’t think any of us are that worried about what division we end up in and if it makes it harder or not.
User avatar
GeorgesGoons
Reactions:
Posts: 23176
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
Location: Omaha
Contact:

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by GeorgesGoons »

wdoupis wrote:I don’t think it has anything to do with who is winning. I am in one of the easiest divisions and voted yes. Corey and Ted support it. I don’t think any of us are that worried about what division we end up in and if it makes it harder or not.
I'm not worried what division I am in. I'd want to be in with Nick, Corey and She'll personally. I just think 1 division gives us true seeding for the playoffs. There is no reason for Shell to have to chance one of his studs getting injured in the Wildcard series in the format you are pushing for. Hell, do 10 divisions for all I care as long as the top 2 teams get 1 and 2 seeds
ImageImageImage
wdoupis
Reactions:
Posts: 14551
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:21 pm
Location: Richmond Greeks

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by wdoupis »

I am not pushing for anything, just responding to posts. I think realignment is good to reinvigorate things from time to time but whatever guys decide is fine with me.

There is no perfect system, every sport has the same problem but most of the time it’s teally not an issue. Boston/Richmond have been 1-2 for most of the last decade. This is the first time I remember this happening in the AL in a long time.

It just sounds like guys are making a really big issue out of something that is not really a big issue and I rarely even hear guys talk or complain about it
User avatar
GeorgesGoons
Reactions:
Posts: 23176
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
Location: Omaha
Contact:

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by GeorgesGoons »

wdoupis wrote:I am not pushing for anything, just responding to posts. I think realignment is good to reinvigorate things from time to time but whatever guys decide is fine with me.

There is no perfect system, every sport has the same problem but most of the time it’s teally not an issue. Boston/Richmond have been 1-2 for most of the last decade. This is the first time I remember this happening in the AL in a long time.

It just sounds like guys are making a really big issue out of something that is not really a big issue and I rarely even hear guys talk or complain about it
There is zero reason to complain, but if we are changing let's get the best solution on the table. Do it like the NBA and seed by AL/NL as a whole.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Uuaww
Reactions:
Posts: 14376
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:13 am
Location: Washington Thunder Crabs

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by Uuaww »

GeorgesGoons wrote:
wdoupis wrote:I am not pushing for anything, just responding to posts. I think realignment is good to reinvigorate things from time to time but whatever guys decide is fine with me.

There is no perfect system, every sport has the same problem but most of the time it’s teally not an issue. Boston/Richmond have been 1-2 for most of the last decade. This is the first time I remember this happening in the AL in a long time.

It just sounds like guys are making a really big issue out of something that is not really a big issue and I rarely even hear guys talk or complain about it
Can we have divisions with the top two teams getting g byes regardless?
There is zero reason to complain, but if we are changing let's get the best solution on the table. Do it like the NBA and seed by AL/NL as a whole.
User avatar
shel311
NDL Championships
NDL Championships
Reactions:
Posts: 72606
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
Location: Sheltown Shockers

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by shel311 »

GeorgesGoons wrote:
wdoupis wrote:I am not pushing for anything, just responding to posts. I think realignment is good to reinvigorate things from time to time but whatever guys decide is fine with me.

There is no perfect system, every sport has the same problem but most of the time it’s teally not an issue. Boston/Richmond have been 1-2 for most of the last decade. This is the first time I remember this happening in the AL in a long time.

It just sounds like guys are making a really big issue out of something that is not really a big issue and I rarely even hear guys talk or complain about it
There is zero reason to complain, but if we are changing let's get the best solution on the table. Do it like the NBA and seed by AL/NL as a whole.
In fairness, NBA division winners are sometimes seeded ahead of non division winners with better records.
User avatar
Seeitsaveit13
Reactions:
Posts: 15327
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:14 am
Location: NDL:O at Heart

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by Seeitsaveit13 »

wdoupis wrote:I don’t think it has anything to do with who is winning. I am in one of the easiest divisions and voted yes. Corey and Ted support it. I don’t think any of us are that worried about what division we end up in and if it makes it harder or not.
No I meant Winter Meeting polls always seem to vary on % required to win based on what option is winning and who supports/doesn't support it.
ImageImageImageImage
nick
Reactions:
Posts: 44851
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:40 pm

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by nick »

shel311 wrote:
GeorgesGoons wrote:
wdoupis wrote:I am not pushing for anything, just responding to posts. I think realignment is good to reinvigorate things from time to time but whatever guys decide is fine with me.

There is no perfect system, every sport has the same problem but most of the time it’s teally not an issue. Boston/Richmond have been 1-2 for most of the last decade. This is the first time I remember this happening in the AL in a long time.

It just sounds like guys are making a really big issue out of something that is not really a big issue and I rarely even hear guys talk or complain about it
There is zero reason to complain, but if we are changing let's get the best solution on the table. Do it like the NBA and seed by AL/NL as a whole.
In fairness, NBA division winners are sometimes seeded ahead of non division winners with better records.
not anymore
User avatar
Cnasty
NDL Championships
NDL Championships
Reactions:
Posts: 65672
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: NDL:F Headquarters: Orlando

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by Cnasty »

AL East:
Boston

You guys figure out the rest. :)
User avatar
DRWebs
Reactions:
Posts: 9746
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:10 am
Location: CO

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by DRWebs »

The_Niddler wrote:... 1 division per league. Take the top 8 teams in the AL and give #1 and #2 a bye the first round. Do the same in the NL
Seems the best way to avoid our current predicament and ensuring the best seeding scenarios. AL/NL or EAST/WEST whatever you want to call them
nick
Reactions:
Posts: 44851
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:40 pm

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by nick »

8 teams and 1/2 get bye eh.. so in the 2nd round when we have 5 teams...
nick
Reactions:
Posts: 44851
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:40 pm

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by nick »

Cnasty wrote:AL East:
Boston
MIami

You guys figure out the rest. :)
ftfy
User avatar
DRWebs
Reactions:
Posts: 9746
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:10 am
Location: CO

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by DRWebs »

nick wrote:8 teams and 1/2 get bye eh.. so in the 2nd round when we have 5 teams...
Yeah, think he meant 6 and I didn't catch it in the quote
User avatar
Uuaww
Reactions:
Posts: 14376
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:13 am
Location: Washington Thunder Crabs

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by Uuaww »

nick wrote:
Cnasty wrote:AL East:
Boston
MIami

You guys figure out the rest. :)
ftfy
Id like to keep the AL/NL the same.
wdoupis
Reactions:
Posts: 14551
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:21 pm
Location: Richmond Greeks

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by wdoupis »

I plan on doing rollover quickly Saturday morning so we need to get this decided today. Still 13 votes unaccounted for. Try to reach out to guys who you think have probably not voted.
User avatar
GeorgesGoons
Reactions:
Posts: 23176
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:19 am
Location: Omaha
Contact:

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by GeorgesGoons »

I thought I would have been one of the lone decenters here with the two options that were given for divisions.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
shel311
NDL Championships
NDL Championships
Reactions:
Posts: 72606
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:51 pm
Location: Sheltown Shockers

Re: Realignment Poll

Post by shel311 »

GeorgesGoons wrote:I thought I would have been one of the lone decenters here with the two options that were given for divisions.
Yea, I figured this one would be a no brainer to get through.

It's probably the closest vote we've ever had the entire way through.
Post Reply

Return to “Winter Meetings”