NDL Forum

bigred wrote:

BFiVL wrote:Hesiman

6ftdeep wrote:

bigred wrote:

BFiVL wrote:Hesiman

all the way

I'm aboard the All American bandwagon!!!!!!!!!!!!

Junior Varsity?

oldschoola wrote:

6ftdeep wrote:

bigred wrote:

BFiVL wrote:Hesiman

all the way

Percentage has gone up the more I play on AA. Maybe up to 83% now. To many silly broken tackles on AA.

Cnasty wrote:

oldschoola wrote:

6ftdeep wrote:

bigred wrote:

BFiVL wrote:Hesiman

all the way

Percentage has gone up the more I play on AA. Maybe up to 83% now. To many silly broken tackles on AA.

Are you selecting Aggressive-Big Hit? This makes a HUGE difference. I've noticed by going Wrap Up, I rarely ever miss a tackle. I went from flopping all around Jahvid Best to squashing like the little bug that he is!

I've seem some retarded break tackles when I'm on offense. On AA it's almost to the point where I'm thinking if it's a 1v1 situation it's going for a big - check that HUGE - play 90% of the time. I'm still going to say there's plenty of offense on Heisman right now, and will only get easier as people play more games.

heisman baby....THIS IS THE NDL, not intramurals!!!

true...if u guys are having alot of your tackles broken you're on agressive or even normal for big hit..go conservative and it'll be cut down. ALOT.

if you're agressive and the offense is agressive in the break tackle then it only stands to reason you're gonna miss a shitload no matter the level you're playing on...ESPECIALLY in 1v1

Nole4real wrote:true...if u guys are having alot of your tackles broken you're on agressive or even normal for big hit..go conservative and it'll be cut down. ALOT.

if you're agressive and the offense is agressive in the break tackle then it only stands to reason you're gonna miss a shitload no matter the level you're playing on...ESPECIALLY in 1v1

Pssssst, I dont use any of that shit.

AA is just lame. Thats all.

50-40 games will be avg, 80-70 games will be seen if we play on AA. Me and Crowes just had a 99 point game on Hesiman.

Heisman. AA would make stats out of this world. 3000 yard backs and ungodly yardages for passers.

BFiVL wrote:50-40 games will be avg, 80-70 games will be seen if we play on AA. Me and Crowes just had a 99 point game on Hesiman.

Damn, this is some SERIOUS exaggeration, lol.

I played 1 high scoring game, and that was on heisman.

Besides that EVERY game has been pretty standard, and i've played more on AA,s o I have no earthly idea how AA games are going to average 80-70 when they seem to be averaging realistic stats for everyone right now, lol.

How many games have you played on each???? And if you played some on AA, how many times did someone score 70?

Exaggeration yes.

BUT combined total score, I would tend to agree. Im all for wide open and fun ability for EVERYONE, but 70-80 seems like a pretty fair assesment of total scores for both teams.

I think every AA game I had so far was in that range if not 60-70 range.

Again, not bashing either level but I personally love Heisman and AA would just be who gets the ball last wins. Then again, Im not a good representation because my D is HORRID.

shel311 wrote:

BFiVL wrote:50-40 games will be avg, 80-70 games will be seen if we play on AA. Me and Crowes just had a 99 point game on Hesiman.

Damn, this is some SERIOUS exaggeration, lol.

I played 1 high scoring game, and that was on heisman.

Besides that EVERY game has been pretty standard, and i've played more on AA,s o I have no earthly idea how AA games are going to average 80-70 when they seem to be averaging realistic stats for everyone right now, lol.

How many games have you played on each???? And if you played some on AA, how many times did someone score 70?

Once guys get the aggressive/conservative stuff figured out the score are gonna shoot through the roof. IMO The broken tackles are horrible on Heisman but even worse on AA with an impact back.

I just scored 63 on hesiman, 70 is not far fetched since I am pulling back mid way through the 4th. I have played at least 3 on AA with about 3-4 on Hesiman, scored nothing less than 30 on AA. this game is only 2 days out the box, wait till folks get good. Nole will put up odds later but 3000 yard rushers will be seeing on AA.

Crowes wrote:Heisman. AA would make stats out of this world. 3000 yard backs and ungodly yardages for passers.

I have held people under 100 yards with Colorado a couple times on AA, if you get a feel for your opponents play calling you can shut someones offense down on any level.

Anyone else notice that diving after an offensive player is almost completely useless this year especially if your chasing someone down.

fsupenguin wrote:I have held people under 100 yards with Colorado a couple times on AA, if you get a feel for your opponents play calling you can shut someones offense down on any level.

I tested the "run guess" crap and you can dominate the run if you guess right but can also get burned a lot. I for one dont care for it because its a huge line crash basically and even when you guess wrong,guys come in untouched.

Tecmo Bowl guessing of plays basically...its FANtastic.

BFiVL wrote: this game is only 2 days out the box, wait till folks get good

Well, I think guys will get better defensively once they learn the camera angles, so it will probably even out.

But 80-70? Come on now.

Plus, you said you scored 30+ in 3 straight AA games. Is that really unrealistic for a college football game??? Not at all.

Our league has been so ridiculously defensive oriented and the INTs out of hand for years now. Playing on AA will balance that out. I dont know that we'd have 3000 yard rushers, but even if we have 5-8 2000 yard rushers, is that any worse than having only about 15 guys in the entire league who throw more TDs than INTs???