

Media Poll:


I for one saw it as comparing who the teams with one lose lost to, so I put Arizona St in front of both of them, with Pitt next then Rutgers, basicly Rutgers loss was to Northwestern so it hurt them more in my eyes. Does that make sense?ChampDizzle wrote:not that big of a deal but just wondering why someone would put Pitt over Rutgers? Rutgers won the Big East and beat Pitt H2H and Rutgers ended on a 11 game win streak after a 4 point loss to Northwestern, who would have had a better record if didn't quit. Like I said not a big deal but I guess the NoleFactor played a role
Head to head is one way of looking at it, but I am looking at all of the one loss teams, and not just Pitt and Rutgers, then I look at who you lost to. In a but shell, Pitt lost to a strong ranked team, and Rutgers lost to a team that finished 3-9. Basicly who you lose to matters more than who you beat sometimes.pounddarock wrote:no, because if that is the case and Rutgers lost to Northwestern, what does that say for Pitt who then lost to Rutgers, who lost to Northwestern.
now that makes sense
Public now: http://onlinedynasty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1204Quest4Gold wrote:I went with conference champions as well. When will the polls become public?
It should have happened back in week 9, but who knows based on some of the polls I've seen.fsupenguin wrote:So none of you pays attention to the fact that Pitt has been ranked higher than Rutgers before this last round of voting? Why would they pass them now. Seems like a silly argument to jump a team in the last week due to a game that was back in week 9. If it didn't happen then, why would it now?
Not as much here as in the real world it would seem.pounddarock wrote:yeah, and I assume that most guys keep their own polls, for example, I always try to go back to my previous poll..not what the actual polls show. Pitt should have dropped from #3 once they lost. I think that when you lose is just as important as who you lose to.