Typically, the best teams in the nation are under 100 while most everyone else fits into the 100-150 range. The NDL's will be slightly higher because of the insanely high YPA averages we get in this video game. Passer efficiency is bullshit anyway.GeorgesGoons wrote:What is considered good? I would assume I'm on the border of not good.
Pass Efficiency Defense
Re: Pass Efficiency Defense
- huskerskev84
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:16 pm
Re: Pass Efficiency Defense
I read somewhere that back in the day when the NCAA was formulating this pass efficiency number, that they intended 100 to be an "average" quarterback and the NFL intended 100 to be elite. Well, 100 in the NFL is now broken much more regularly. I remember Steve Young was the guy that seemed to be the first to top that on a regular basis. In college, I've NEVER followed it. I think its tracked more defensively than offensively in college.



Re: Pass Efficiency Defense
Until they find something more relevant, you will see it more and more in college football. Passer efficiency is a stat only designed to measure forward passing; running is not factored it, which made it useless to compare college quarterbacks. As we get more and more offenses away from that, it will become more prevalent.huskerskev84 wrote:I read somewhere that back in the day when the NCAA was formulating this pass efficiency number, that they intended 100 to be an "average" quarterback and the NFL intended 100 to be elite. Well, 100 in the NFL is now broken much more regularly. I remember Steve Young was the guy that seemed to be the first to top that on a regular basis. In college, I've NEVER followed it. I think its tracked more defensively than offensively in college.
That said, the stat still sucks.
Re: Pass Efficiency Defense
wtf???
i got these stats
73-104, 1429, 19TD, 9INT and the passer rating is 300+!!?!??!?!?!??!?!
im THAT bad??
i got these stats
73-104, 1429, 19TD, 9INT and the passer rating is 300+!!?!??!?!?!??!?!
im THAT bad??
Re: Pass Efficiency Defense
Because of the way the formula for figuring out passer efficiency, ATTEMPTS come first in most calculators. Swap your completions and attempts.nick wrote:wtf???
i got these stats
73-104, 1429, 19TD, 9INT and the passer rating is 300+!!?!??!?!?!??!?!
im THAT bad??
- texasfan4444
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9858
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:23 pm
- Location: Tulsa, OK
- Contact:
Re: Pass Efficiency Defense
thats twice i beleive. I have the over/under on this one at 5 by Thanksgiving Day.trendon wrote:Because of the way the formula for figuring out passer efficiency, ATTEMPTS come first in most calculators. Swap your completions and attempts.nick wrote:wtf???
i got these stats
73-104, 1429, 19TD, 9INT and the passer rating is 300+!!?!??!?!?!??!?!
im THAT bad??