Eliminate Revenue Sharing

[shel311]

If the demands aren't realistic, then why not adjust the target FA values?

Right, why would we eliminate revenue sharing, which has nothing to with our actual issue?

Wasted's band-aid post nailed it.

[Cnasty]

If the demands aren't realistic, then why not adjust the target FA values?

I've mentioned that in another thread just like when we adjusted the coaches/managers demands in the past.

[wdoupis]

The demands have not changed. I am not near game but a superstar player is set at 18 and it trickles down from there

[Wasted Memory]

The demands have not changed.

Are you saying that with a straight face? Seriously?

[shel311]

The demands have not changed.

Are you saying that with a straight face? Seriously?

He means the designated amount set behind the scenes.

[Wasted Memory]

The demands have not changed.

Are you saying that with a straight face? Seriously?

He means the designated amount set behind the scenes.

Ah, gotcha.

[ajalves]

one issue is media revenue is still like 40 mill per team (or it was when I left) .....what do the modern day 'real life' teams make? 100-200 mill per for the bigger markets? total guess.

media revenue has been the same for as long as I can remember...

if everything is scaling upward, then so should media $$